导过来了
best candidate是想要吸引的,也就是potential member(judges)
现在的judges因为没有加薪,所以没有达到理想的状态,是current one
P说的current ones不做讲座不代表加薪了以后吸引过来的best candidates也不做讲座
Electra只出现在L里,而L没有附带commentary。所以后世不一定没有对E的commentary,但一定没有E+commentary(因为E只在L出现了)
只需要把这个例子化简即可。
前面半截等于=(1/5)m*(1/2*1/2)18=(1/5)m*(1/2)36
后面半截等于=1/2*(1/10)35 =1/2*(1/2)35*(1/5)35=(1/2)36*(1/5)35
所以:(1/5)m*(1/2)36 =(1/2)36*(1/5)35
M=35
【思路】最少有四次的頭表示 : 四次有頭的機率(不管順序) + 五次全頭的機率
=(0.6)^4 * 0.4 * C4 5 + (0.6)^5
求毛利:
卖出的价格是:卖价=买价+卖价的40% 卖出的价格=150+40%卖出的价格
所以卖出的价格是:250刀
毛利就是:250-150=100刀
more 比较需要排除自己,加other更好。B 用than other yet discovered xxxx
除了该用最高级以外,more+adj+n本来就是一个会引起歧义的说法 比如offer more dramatic evidence, 到底是更dramatic的evidence还是更多的dramatic evidence呢
考点: 平行对称(Parallelism)、简洁有效(Rhetorical Construction)、指代一致(Agreement)
1) not only…but also…连接的对象一定要平行
2) 主动语态优于被动语态
3) 并列句主语相同,应该省略重复的主语.
(A) 使用被动语态(was encouraged…),增加句子的复杂性;whether开头的结构笨拙复杂,且it没有可以指代的对象.
(B) –ing结构encouraging…作为stigmatized selfness的伴随成分,而从句子的逻辑意思上看,该成分应该跟stigmatized并列;both…but also结构不符合习惯用法.应该改为not only…but also或者both…and结构
(C) also encouraging和stigmatized不平行
(D) 并列句主句相同,they应该省略;如果一定要用they的话,and前面必须用逗号隔开,构成一个新的句子;whether…or also结构笨拙复杂,且it没有可以指代的对象
(E) 正确, encouraged同developed构成并列谓语;not only…but also符合习惯用法
句子结构: Ancient hunter-gatherers developed instincts that stigmatized…, and encouraged…, not only with…but also with…
X=(120000*10+3*120000+5*120000)/12
X=(1200000+360000+600000)/12
= 2160000/12
=180000
N P是整数,P>0么?即问P是正整数么?
(1)n+1>0 n>-1 只有n没有跟P相关的;不充分。
(2)Np>0 只能说明np同号,有可能都为负整数;不充分。
联立:n>-1 n=0 n=1
NP>0 n又必须满足大于-1的正整数,所以n最小值也就是1,p>0
充分
前50个偶数,是从1到100产生的,和是2250,从102到200之间也有50个偶数,每个数比前50个偶数大100,所以50*100+2250=7550,简单快速
"most of them at least as large as Jupiter" modifies "planets." Notice that the only verb in C is "have detected," so you don't have a run-on sentence.
A run-on sentence is one in which at least two independent clauses are joined without the appropriate punctuation. You can't have two independent clauses if you don't have two clauses, and you can't have two clauses if you don't have two verbs.
"Circling" is not a verb in C, but a modifier.
D应该是 3 restrinctions 应该 include restriction1 on A, r2 onB, r3 on C ,而不是直接restrinction on A B C
E直接说禁止了(restrictions on)ABC是可以的
A)media是复数(单数是medium),应该用media have;has had as a focus...可以直接用focus避免wordy
b)analyses的谓语动词应该是复数have
d) #Ron#have had as a focus与have overlooked...的平行程度不如
c); have had as a focus...wordy
e) media的谓语应该是have,时态错误
C
* "continues strong" doesn't make sense. "strong" is an adjective; there is no noun here for it to modify.
* "would" is wrong; it should be "will".
("would" has 2 main uses: 1 * it's the past tense of "will". i have no idea what the actual name of this tense is, but you can think of it as "a tense that WAS the future, at that time in the past." for instance: Jim knows that his son will make the game-winning shot. this sentence translates into the past tense as Jim knew that his son would make the game-winning shot. 2 * it's a CONDITIONAL - i.e., it describes what would occur in some alternate situation that is not actually the case. for instance: if i were rich, i would buy my own island.)
* the analysts' predictions are ongoing into the present, so the past tense "predicted" is inappropriate.
(转)Point to discuss:
As per manhattanprep.c…-t7994-15.html
"what his father gave him are a few books."
Ron: "no, you would still write "is", because the subject of the verb is still what his father gave him, not a few books."
The subject here is “what is much more difficult to determine”
As per Manhattan SC guide this is called Sub Phrase and it is always singular.
news是单数名词,应该用was
重复性同位语
D是说的减少车道,但文中的方案是两项:减少车道+增加自行车和人行道,并且重心在后者,因为是making downtown easier to reach。所以D是迷惑选项
zoo employee是包含在general里的
A.employee的30%是是得了过敏症的人已经流出后的结果,可以认为是比自然感染率低了,所以general会更高