有一个问题,如果学生老师比假设是6,现在只有5个学生,10个老师,那即使学生增加到60人,也是没有教师职位空缺的。所以现在的师生比例不也是可以影响题目的结论的吗。所以选项c可以考虑的吧? b选项申请者数量多了,如果教师职位数也多了,是不会影响就业容易程度的啊,b也是有瑕疵的哦。
结论是,找到一份教师的工作不会变的“更难”。所以,就算是你说的这种情况成立,那么当经济危机来了,只能说老师工作还是很难找,但至少不会比之前10个老师和5个学生更难嘛~
哦知道了,我还有其他很多问题都没有得到指导哦。越做越差了,想老师帮看看我主要问题是啥啊,下面要怎么提高哦
同问
这题答案好像给错了,应该是A。
unlikely
b不是相关因果的间接cq方向么,即不是盐导致高血压,而是盐加住在城市一起导致高血压?
忽略
為什麼than under it可以表示比較兩種年紀?是省略?
是的。这里补全是:
more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than more babies were born to women under it.
老师,有好多题都没有解释额
OG2017的CR是全部都有解释的哈~2016的由于已经是老版本了,所以解释不是那么全哈~
only位置,进行时没有时态标志
B句子不完整
amount of sth.: especially used with uncountable noun.
句子结构
This is from Ron the Manhattan Staff. Hopefully this will help you to understand why C is wrong
First, translate the argument into terms that a 10-year-old can understand.
No 10-year-old would understand “insufficient canvassing effort”. That's bad. So, simplify.
This means “They put too much effort into calling people who had already donated in the past, and didn't put enough effort into calling random people who had NEVER donated”
看不懂
选项B里的do so指的是用BC的机场啊。。。这个so为啥指的是用BC的机场呢?
感觉选项好绕。。。明明看懂题了结果不知道选项说的啥意思。。。
没看懂题,还以为是污染排放的问题。。。
在C中是不是也有这个考点呀?A's B中,A不能有修饰语(包括同位语和定语),要想添加修饰语,要变成of 型所有格:B of A, which does C。