Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete one day may be partners the next.
Whereas lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, in the Internet industry they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete
Although the lines of competition are clearly defined in industries that are more established, they are blurred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as competing companies
The lines of competition are clearly defined in the more established industries, unlike the Internet where they are blurred and indistinct, as companies that compete
Unlike more established industries, where the lines of competition are clearly defined, they are burred and indistinct in the Internet industry, as companies that compete
Unlike more established industries, with clearly defined lines of competition, those of the Internet industry are blurred and indistinct,as competing companies
题目分析:
本题难度较大,尤其是前三个选项。本题的意思是:在传统工业中,竞争的分界是十分清晰的,但是在互联网行业中,这样的分界很模糊,是因为那些在某一天具有竞争关系的公司可能会在第二天或者下一天变成合作伙伴。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
B选项:本选项的错误出现在最后,现在分词competing直接做形容词放在companies身前,这是不正确的,必须将compete作为定语从句(就像选项(A)那样)。这是因为,原因状语这句话是在解释为什么互联网工业的竞争分界线显得模糊,这个模糊的原因是:“在某一天”具有竞争关系的公司可能会在下一天变成合作伙伴。因此,compete和其身后的one day是有联系的,即,compete one day是一个完整的句子,不能分开安放。
C选项:unlike身后连接的是the Internet,但真正应该比较的是“传统工业”和“互联网工业”,即,internet之后少了industry。
D选项:代词they的指代对象是lines of competition。这使得unlike连接的两者不可比。应该是已成熟的工业和互联网工业的对比,而不是和lines of competition对比。
E选项:比较对象错误同选项(D)。
根据句子想要表达的意思:竞争的界限在已经成熟的行业内被很好得定义了,然而在互联网行业内它们是很模糊和无法分辨的,因为公司们前一天还在竞争后一天就成合作伙伴了。
choice a, 完整的表达出了这个意思。
choice b, competing变成了companies的定语,one day只能就近去修饰companies,意思变成了某一天的竞争公司。one day不可能去修饰谓语动词may be partners因为the next作为状语修饰了这个谓语动词
whereas=although, B冗杂
在AB之间犹豫,还想到了doing和从句的区别....doing有自带属性的意思
B问题:although其实跟Whereas意思相近,所以没问题。但后面的as competing companies one day may be partners the next, one day变成了be 的状语, 那意思变成是be partner又one day又the next, 意思矛盾。
此题的比较对象是line of competition, 但C变成了两个industry在相比(即使internet后面加上industry), 不对。
分词往往表示一种自带属性,而定语从句表示的是一种暂时的属性
unlike应该是修饰主语the lines of competition吧?所以除了industry漏了,还因为对比对象不同类
B还有个问题,that are more established,冗杂,其实直接more established industry就可以
more established industries这里面没有修饰歧义吗?more可以修饰established也可以修饰industries?更健全还是更多?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
There is no problem with the beginning of choice B. The problem is at the end of that choice.
Immediately following the underline is "...one day". One day describes the competition, not the companies. (They compete one day, but cooperate the next.)
Choice B fails there.
Ron在曼哈顿的论坛上说正确答案是A啊...
而且这句话的重心应该是放在compete和be partner这两个动作的对比上 总感觉直接用competing直接修饰company很不好
不能两个时间状语从句 one day.. the next
请问:这里的 more established industries 不会有歧义吗?
分词往往表示一种自带属性,而定语从句表示的是一种暂时的属性
competing修饰company好像有他一直自带竞争的意思,感觉用定于从句限定是哪些公司更合理一些
我开始比较A与B, 看见B将in the internet industry放在了后面,companies that compete 变成了competing companies, 觉得B比A简洁。
但是competing companies one day may be the partners the next. 两个时间状语,错误。
B的as 后面变成了,
其实把B带回原句“as competing companies one day may be partners the next.”就知道肯定不对了。既然be partners是发生在the next 的事情,那么在one day一定也发生了一些事情,只说competing companies是不能表达发生了什么事情的。所以要用companies that compete one day
正解
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
老师,怎么判断they指代的是industries还是lines?
错选了B考试时候这种题是到时间蒙吗?感觉能力还是不足,哭哭
【提问】老师,我感觉AB选项基本都是差不多的,您讲的那个one day 的问题,我感觉one day是个时间状语吧,应该是one day may be partner吧?为什么one day一定要和compete在一块儿呢?谢谢
【提问】老师好,根据您语法书里面的内容,想问下adj+n是否等于限定性定语?另外,although和whereas在这里有没有差别?
C选项是不是还有一个问题是比较对象有误,如果将unlike后面的句子提前,比较的也是the internet 和lines of competition?
怎么能随便换unlike的位置呢,它要就近修饰一个名词啊。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论