扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-CR-43
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
C.已经有工作的人再去找工作会找到那些更高工资的工作。所以，可以先接受低工资的工作，就能找到高工资的工作了，这也是一个刺激。
原文： However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement. 如果一个人被带薪聘用且他的工资高过政府补助的话，就不会收到补助。因此，没有工作的人就没有财政刺激去接受那些能让他们收到补助的工作。
C的意思是只有先被employed才有可能获得更高收入的工作，这就是对unemployed人的激励。
这答案我要疯了？结论不是说那些没有工作的人没有金钱激励去找那些有政府补贴的工作嘛？那答案C表达的是已经有工作的人和没有工作的人比对，这怎么削弱结论？ A难道不对？政府对这项补贴不收税不就是变相增加这种工作的收入了吗？这样不就是有金钱激励了吗？
政府不收税的不是对工作收入的补贴，是对失业者的补贴~ 所以反了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论