According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.
Which of the following is true about Martin's theory, as that theory is described in the passage?
It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.
It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.
It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.
It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.
It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案:E. 它承认除了人类入侵之外,其他因素也可能在更新世物种灭绝中发挥了作用。
Martin 理论承认Paleoindians 主要依赖狩猎来生存是不对的,因为这段文字未提及,所以 A 选项错误。它也否认 Palseontienne 物种灭绝的原因是气候变化是错误的,因为它引用了Krech 的理论,即存在大规模的气候变化,所以 B 选项错误。它也没有利用人类在其他情况下造成的局部灭绝作为证据,所以 C 选项错误。它也没有尝试解决有关人类入侵北美日期的争议,所以 D 选项错误。Martin 理论承认除了人类入侵之外,其他因素也可能在更新世物种灭绝中发挥了作用,因为结合 White 的观点,可以得出这一结论,所以 E 选项正确。
Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene.
仍然是exclusion没有看到,排除,错选两题
can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans
不好意思,SK是认为是气候(PM认为不是气候)
三个人:PM:1、人类干的,2、climate干的
SK:1、人类没有hunt,2、不是大动物,3、不是天气(否认PM),4、怎么看都可能是人类
RW:否认SK,SK忽略了一个矛盾
A无中生有,文章没说,就算要选,也可能是SK而不是PM的观点(SK的第四个观点);B原文中有;C SK的第四个观点;D RW指出的SK无视的矛盾;E SK的第四个观点
在一篇文章有很多人持有观点时,每个人的观点都是一个PIE组合,要简要记录
Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene.
exclusion
Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation
M认为气候变化不是影响因素,而K认为气候变化是次要的影响因素
Martin's exclusion of climatic change 所以选b
Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. 所以,Martin认为气候变化不是动物灭绝的原因。
我发现但凡是文章中有很多人名的时候我就搞不清到谁是谁的观点,这个怎么破??
Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation 。。。。。。
把martin看成krech了
大脑自动把exclusion看成了conclusion是什么鬼...
我...我也。。。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论