One proposal for preserving rain forests is to promote the adoption of new agricultural technologies, such as improved plant varieties and use of chemical herbicides, which would increase productivity and slow deforestation by reducing demand for new cropland. Studies have shown that farmers in developing countries who have achieved certain levels of education, wealth, and security of land tenure are more likely to adopt such technologies. But these studies have focused on villages with limited land that are tied to a market economy rather than on the relatively isolated, self-sufficient communities with ample land characteristic of rain-forest regions. A recent study of the Tawahka people of the Honduran rain forest found that farmers with some formal education were more likely to adopt improved plant varieties but less likely to use chemical herbicides and that those who spoke Spanish (the language of the market economy) were more likely to adopt both technologies. Nonland wealth was also associated with more adoption of both technologies, but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies. Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household's duration of residence in its village. They found that longer residence correlated with more adoption of improved plant varieties but less adoption of chemical herbicides.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
evaluate the likelihood that a particular proposal, if implemented, would ultimately succeed in achieving its intended result
question the assumption that certain technological innovations are the most effective means of realizing a particular environmental objective
discuss the progress of efforts to encourage a particular traditional society to adopt certain modern agricultural methods
present the results of new research suggesting that previous findings concerning one set of conditions may not be generalizable to another set of conditions
weigh the relative importance of three factors in determining whether a particular strategy will be successful
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是D。选择D的原因是,文章讨论了“一个特定的传统社会如何采用现代农业方法”的进展,并提出了新研究结果,表明以前关于一组条件的发现可能无法推广到另一组条件。
本文没有说成功性,说的是影响proposal被接受的程度的因素。欠练
A recent study of the Tawahka 说明之前农民的情况不适用于isolated, self-sufficient communities with ample land characteristic of rain-forest regions,即D选项。
A强调的是实施政策后成功的可能性??题目讨论的是农民对于政策的接受程度
理解题太慢了...
①最开始的调查只对developing country中不同的农民进行了分类:who have achieved certain levels of education, wealth, and security of land tenure更愿意接受新科技
②紧接着提出了两种village形式、有土地量的多少、土地占有保证情况对于农民对于科技接受程度的影响,更把接受新科技分为更接受其中的哪一种(更细致)
A错在哪里了?感觉和D说的差不多呀,文章确实给出了各种情况下的可能性?
还是不太懂,D也太笼统了吧,不是说要找含有文章议论主体的选项吗?主体是为了保护雨林,推行新农业
通读全文才能最好地看出来文章的主旨
文章主旨不是只看文章说了什么
开头先说为保护热带雨林,农业应该增加种植多样性并且使用化学除草剂,但是发展中国家贸易地区与相对独立的地区人们的接受结果是不一样的,所以选D