Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
题目分析:
略
选项分析:
A选项:现在分词短语carefully coordinating them with her narratives在本选项的位置上容易被误以为是her book illustrations的非限定性定语(毕竟,这个分词短语距离名词illustrations是最近的)。但这是不正确的,“协调说明和自己的故事”的应该是Beatrix Potter这个人,而不是“说明”。
B选项:本选项错误同(A)。
C选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。which she carefully coordinated with her narratives是非限定性定语从句,就近修饰名词her book illustrations,该先行词在定语从句中充当coordinate的宾语。
D选项:carefully coordinated with her narratives是过去分词短语,是被动语态。将其逻辑主语Beatrix Potter代入,则有:
Beatrix Potter was carefully coordinated with her narratives.
这是不合逻辑的。应该是Beatrix Potter主动的发出“协调”这一动作。
E选项:本选项中coordinate和capitalize成为了一个合句。这个合句的前半句为:
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives.
代词them的指代对象为her book illustrations,将其代入,这个句子变为:
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated her book illustrations with her narratives.
这个句子相当于提到了两次her book illustrations,引起了赘余。
请注意,代词本质上就是其指代的那个名词,也可以算作赘余,例如:
在书里,小明看懂了这本书里讲的内容。
虽然第二个划线部分中的“这本书”是代词,但是显然两个“书”中有一个是赘余的。
感觉AB的carefully是副词,是不可以修饰coordinating名词的,不知道这样理解对不对
这个题。。。真的学多了容易做错
选了E
d中Carefully coordinated with her narratives变成了被动语态,不对
d应该是Carefully coordinating(不是coordinated )with her narratives,
因为with的缘故一样会是错的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
E 代词不要放在插入语里
1. 如果in her book illustrations 和 carefully coordinating them with her narratives 都作为对谓语capitalize的修饰 都放在谓语前面不合适
2. 从语义上 carefully coordinating them with her narratives 不符合对谓语capitalize的修饰
根据句意选择合适的选项
这题错选了E,但我比较倾向于E中状语变插入语影响句意的说法,“in her book illustrations”在E中变成插入语,插入语删除应该不影响核心句意才对
注意AB的ing就近修饰
代词指代,是发生在不同的句子里;
ABE 的them的指代对象为her book illustrations,带回原文指代发生在同一个句子里才造成赘述 。 in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated her book illustrations with her narratives;
Mark这题3遍还错
你这第一句话让我有点启发,有出处吗?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
补充: A和B,成分结构一模一样,只是伴随插入顺序不同,都用逗号隔开,可以说AB没差,肯定排除;
难道a b 中的coordinating不能做伴随,逻辑主语是beartrix potter
老师你有说过,看一个分词到底是伴随状语还是非限制性定语,就要看逻辑上发出这个分词动作的到底是这个句子的主语还是离这个分词近的词,那么这里ab选项的coordinating只能是Beatrix Potter发出的,不能是illustration发出的,所以一定是伴随状语啊。但是这里怎么又说看它离的近,所以有修饰illustration嫌隙。所以到底是看逻辑意思还是看距离判断伴随状语和非限制性定语。
我也想问这个
同问
同问,为什么不是伴随状语修饰Beatrix Potter的?
我觉得应该可以是potter,ab错在them指代吧
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
mark
1-them的指代对象为her book illustrations,带回原文,ABE均赘述 in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated her book illustrations with her narratives; 排除
2-D中carefully coordinated with her narratives是过去分词短语,被动语态,不合逻辑,应该主动;
选C
曾在网上看到E的一个解释版本,说因为插入语是可以忽略不看的,所以主句的them就没了指代对象。可以这样理解吗?
我也见过这种解答
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
D 选项将 coordinated 改成 coordinating是不是就是对的呢?
老师,C选项中没有满足“有疑问要立刻解决的原则”啊 ,her出现了之后没有立刻解释her是谁,这种又怎么看呢
GMAT考试,乃至英语,从来没有这种原则啊~这个原则如果成立,岂不是大部分宾语中的代词都是不正确的了?显然是错误的原则哈~不要被误导哟~
捉住一朵金花
嘻嘻嘻你怎么又倒回去看OG了~
再看一遍 第一次做的不认真
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
老师,为什么不能把AB的carefully coordinating them with her narratives 看作状语成分呢