扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATLA-SC-107
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.
wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is
wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be
wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more fat of a kind thought to be
total fat of wild animals is less than livestock fed on grain and they have more fat of a kind thought to be
total fat is less in wild animals than that of livestock fed on grain and more of their fat is of a kind they think is
题目分析：
略
选项分析：
A选项：代词they没有指代对象。
B选项：Correct. 本选项在逻辑和语法上均是正确的。
C选项：fat of a kind需改为a kind of fat。a kind of是一个固定搭配，表示某一种，不能拆分。of a kind表示“同一类，相似的”，显然不符合本题的含义。另外，这里的that of略有赘余的嫌疑，虽然可以比较两种动物的脂肪，但比较两种动物已经足够清楚，所以这个that of可以不必要添加。
D选项：比较对象不对等，应该比较的是野生动物和家养动物。fat of a kind需改为a kind of fat错误同选项(C)。
E选项：代词they的指代错误同(A)。fat is of a kind错误原理同选项(C)。
这里省略了 do不会产生歧义，是因为野生动物肯定不会含有牲畜，所以比较的对象就是wild animals 有的脂肪量和 livestock 含有的脂肪量 而且这里A选项的do 应该换成does 会更好
and more of a kind of fat thought to be 这个是什么成分？and后边的没有谓语动词，所以是和谁并列？
1.代词they没有指代对象。
2.a kind of是一个固定搭配，表示某一种，不能拆分。of a kind表示“同一类，相似的”
C中的that of 赘余
C compares the total fat of these two kinds of animals rather than comparing the animals themselves.
D is comparing total fat with livestock.
B is the best of the bad boys.
A and E are out because, we don’t have a proper reference for the pronoun they.
B looks apparently better than others, because, in gist, it maintains the comparison between wild animals and domestic animals, although it is also meaning to say that wild animals have less total fat than they have livestock, which is indeed absurd
A选项：代词they没有指代对象。
B选项：wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain和wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain比较对象均✅；
C选项：that of没必要，A is／has...more than B; have more fat of a kind 是要表达have a kind of more fat？
D选项：total fat of wild animals is less than livestock，比较对象不对等
E选项：total fat is less in wild animals than that of livestock fed on grain，平行结构 that of livestock fed on grain中that of应该换成in; they指代错误；
错选 C 只看了比较 忘了看其他 错误
in q24 choice c, the comparison is between ANIMALS and THAT (which in this case stands for FAT). you can't consider livestock to be the second half of the comparison, because it's part of a prepositional phrase (which is a modifier and therefore can't be part of the comparison).
a they无指代
c wild animals是主语 不能用that of 用 do livestock或者直接livestock fat那里也有问题
d 比较应该用that of they不知道指代什么可以指wild animals也可以指livestock
e their和 they指代对象不清
老师，问题问题如下：
A、they能否指代recent studies，即研究认为......
B、按照比较，不是应该加助动词do livestock，才能和左边平行么？比较的对象是less fat，所以应该用wild animals have和do livestock，为什么没有do也对呢？
毕出老师，Prep08-186中 Laos has a land area comparable to that of Britain为何能允许这样that of指代land area的表达，本句中C选项就不可以？
我是这么觉得的，这个题里面其实只有B选项是动物比动物，其他都是动物和脂肪在比。但是Laos那个题，和这边的区别是comparable之后是在描述area，所以应该是area比that of GB， 那就是area 比area. 本题比较干脆，直接用了比较状语，其实是不太一样。期待老师答案。
你自己也说了Laos那题是area跟area在比，那本题C选项就是脂肪跟脂肪在比，而不是你说的动物跟脂肪在比。而脂肪跟脂肪比可以呀
C 是 动物有脂肪 比较 脂肪 （我吃了苹果 比较 苹果？按照平行，应该是我吃了苹果比较你吃了苹果，或苹果 比 苹果) 同理，这个题应该是动物有脂肪 比较 家畜有脂肪 或 脂肪 比 脂肪
另，老挝有land area 比 (that of-land area) of 英国
在老挝那里可以比area, 为什么这里C不行了呢？既然你认为老挝有land area比that of 英国可以接受；为什么C里你要翻译成动物有脂肪比较脂肪呢，那不是跟老挝那题一样吗，如果这里你觉得翻译成动物有脂肪和脂肪比不对，那老挝那题应该也是老挝有土地比土地了
是因为句型不一样啊。你纠结的是Laos那句吧。后面comparable to...中文意思是比较，但是句子结构我认为并没有被分隔开，其实整个句子就是Laos has area, 后面comparable to that of GB就是在修饰area. 我百度了几个comparable to的例子你可以感受下，不可能是句子的主语在和comparable to后面的在比，就是compare前面这个名词在比(或者说在修饰这个名词)。
Farmers were meant to get an income comparable to that of townspeople
Some toilet flush handles also had bacteria comparable to what was found on the floor.
comparable to是前面area的定语，本句是比较， 不一样。如果本句改为wild animals have total fat comparable to that of livestock fed on grain也是对的。
MARK
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
比较看来也是个原则变化不定的考点呀，没办法，只能硬着头皮去理解去掌握了。
A选项不关比较，they的指代是一个严重问题
B选项：在本题中GMAC认为省略的后半部分是可以在不造成歧义的情况下省略谓语的咯，这跟I eat apple more than you冲突咯，那里GMAC可以认为不行的，但如果从合理角度看，显然人也不会去吃人，这个点暂时mark一下。毕出老师的意思就是对于这种类型的比较没有一贯的原则，只需要按照最合理的比较对象去比较就好了。
C选项比较对象其实不对等了，要对等要把前面改成wild animal's total fat is less than that of livestock
D选项比较对象不对等
E选项中的they指代错误同A
注：of a kind表示同一类，即德州扑克里，three of a kind，就是三张一样的牌； They are two of a kind, and totally unreliable. 意思是他们两个是两类人
a kind of 就是一种，在这里语意应该是一种
比較對象是wild animals和livestock；
b：wild animals。。。。than livestock（do）
c：wild animals vs that（fat）比較對象錯誤
mark
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
曼哈顿在“平行”一章中说要“句子与句子”平行，但是又在“comparions”一章中说“在不影响句子表达意思的情况下第二个比较元素可以省略main noun和verb”；
因此，这道题当中的AB平行了比较对象（句子），B里有省略了do；C的比较对象不对等，that（main noun）与wild animals不可比较；D是省略main noun后对等；E省略verb
C 省略主谓
wild animals have less total fat than （wild animals have）that of livestock
wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and (have) more of a kind of thought to be good for cardiac health.
在比较成分比较明显的情况下，不需要对than后面的比较部分作出是主语还是宾语的区分。
2. more of a kind of fat, 而不是 more fat of a kind
D选项主要是total fat of wild animals is less than (that of) livestock , 不该省that of 吧
弱弱的问一下，为什么第二个have可以省略，C是有的