Some historians contend that conditions in the United States during the Second World War gave rise to a dynamic wartime alliance between trade unions and the African American community, an alliance that advanced the cause of civil rights. They conclude that the postwar demise of this vital alliance constituted a lost opportunity for the civil rights movement that followed the war. Other scholars, however, have portrayed organized labor as defending all along the relatively privileged position of White workers relative to African American workers. Clearly, these two perspectives are not easily reconcilable, but the historical reality is not reducible to one or the other.
Unions faced a choice between either maintaining the prewar status quo or promoting a more inclusive approach that sought for all members the right to participate in the internal affairs of unions, access to skilled and high-paying positions within the occupational hierarchy, and protection against management's arbitrary authority in the workplace. While union representatives often voiced this inclusive ideal, in practice unions far more often favored entrenched interests. The accelerating development of the civil rights movement following the Second World War exacerbated the unions' dilemma, forcing trade unionists to confront contradictions in their own practices.
The passage is primarily concerned with
providing a context within which to evaluate opposing viewpoints about a historical phenomenon
identifying a flawed assumption underlying one interpretation of a historical phenomenon
assessing the merits and weaknesses of a controversial theory about a historical phenomenon
discussing the historical importance of the development of a wartime alliance
evaluating evidence used to support a particular interpretation of a historical phenomenon
题目分析:
题目释义:
主旨题目
考点:
主旨(Main idea)
旨在考察我们对文章整体的把握程度,对文章的结构的分析能力和把控能力,以及对作者逻辑的判断。
作者逻辑上是想介绍两个观点。然后说明这个两个观点都不对。即工会面临一个窘境。
选项分析:
A选项:Correct. 一篇评估一个历史事件的两个相反观点的文章。这个翻译过来就和考点上说的差不多啦~
B选项:确定一个对历史事件的解释的一个错误的假设。这个选项没有任何依据在文中。
C选项:评价一个有争议的理论的优点和缺点。作者实际上是提出两个理论,说了这两个理论都有问题,没有提及优点,也不是要说明这些理论的优缺点。
D选项:讨论在战争期间的联盟发展的历史性重要意义。作者一开头提到了联盟,但是以后就没再说过,这个联盟是其中一种观点所提供的背景,与主旨大意不同。
E选项:评估对历史现象的一个特殊解释的证据。文章中并没有提及什么证据,就更不用说评估了。
Clearly, these two perspectives are not easily reconcilable, but the historical reality is not reducible to one or the other.历史事实并不是两种观点的任何一个。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论