毕老师,剩余17min处这题a work可以作同位语成分完整吗? 何时用定语何时用同位语怎么判断呢?
想问下,如果用equally,正确的用法应该是怎样的呢?
n both A and B, you have three verbs (puts..., broadens..., will fall...).
there are exactly two ways to put 3 things into a list in the english language:
• X, Y, and Z
• X, Y, or Z
...and that's it.
there's no such construction as "X, Y, but Z", so, both of the first two choices are gone.
这道题还真考词汇量。。。具象化场景需要啊
为什么不能是并列呢?为什么就不能理解为EA相信这种教育应该在大学里,同时他也相信学生们能被提供很好的教育呢?
我也纠结了一下,但我觉得不应该EA convinced that students could be offered a broad range of courses dealing with social issues吧,如果convince这件事的话就不应该是could了,应该向前者(social work education belonging in the university )是should,是EA想说服这件事情的reform吧,而且其实这两句是有逻辑关系的,是在一个提供social issues课的大学里,学生(才能够)应该有social work education
这题的三个东西绕的我晕😲
食物不能have something (尤其是possibility 和 ability )
sleeping beauty... a boy who sleeps ;
后置定语描述的是名词的暂时属性,前置定语描述的是名词的永久属性或固有属性
from which was derived both northern and southern Indian alphabets.
定语从句的倒装!!很心机的倒装了,看到别扭的句子一定要想到倒装,一定要搞清楚正确句态——both N and S derived from which ....
that 定语从句修饰 animals,复数,而且只有animals 有 preference;
the list 主语 has been expanded to include (因为expand了才能include 低等)
还有把include看成induce的问题能不能不要再犯了!!!
摘"As much as" isn't quantified by a number, because it means "equal".
This newspaper costs as much as that one.
This newspaper costs 50 cents, as much as that one. (Notice "comma + as much as that one" is now a modifier describing the price.)
所以有具体数量时不需用as many as,除非是表示一种强调(牛津词典)
Switzerland and the United States diverged in the degree to which the expansion of industry coincided with the degree of urbanization,这句话老师能否帮忙分析一下成分,特别是to which的介词to ,是to 哪里?
选项C除了后面的表达Smith was not responsible for the debacle和Smith's fault 有区别之外,还有什么错误吗?which这样可以使用吗?
which可以这么用。当然which和that也有轻微的区别,which属于nonessential modifier,就是修饰可有可无,不像that作为修饰,更重要一些。
restricted their gains 在剧中是什么成分,修饰谁,前面是否应该加一个and?
比较经常和代词一起考:先看比较对象是不是对等,然后看代词!
轻罪misdemeanor charge; 因此....关系
would委婉;
economical 节约的 节约的 经济适用的
economic 经济的 经济的 经济的 牛逼经济的
A: 兵马俑花费70000人 36年完成兵马俑军队,them 指代啥?
B:it 指代啥玩意? 兵马俑军队? 重复;
D:army ... 700000 artisans took 俩主语 这么风光?
E:一点都不平行乱
AB: 被动语态by 不是with,去掉
D:having each its own....现在分词短语,无论做伴随状语还是定语都很奇怪;
E:that不能引导非限定性定语从句,each 搭配its
选项d最明显的最正确的没有排除的理由