mark主语(个人理解)It has been many years since the hunting season being closed earlier than the scheduled date. 距离上次捕猎期提前结束已经很多年了-----很久没有因为捕猎过量而提前结束捕猎期了
engage in ...by ...,通过何种方式参与
ab fear的是supplies这个名词 而that 表明害怕不能满足需求这件事
我觉得e选项很合适呢,题目中就是提到了sulfur,e选项也是紧贴sulfur的清除这个维度。城市中sulfur更多,不是应该要把更频繁的更换滤网考虑进去吗?这样才能保证实验结果的公平性呀。只不过按照e的说法,和题干中的结果(城市中还是生长的更慢)匹对不起来,所以e选项到底错在哪里呢??请各位锦鲤来指教一下
1.先看原句,the rest和前面一个主语平行,主语只能是一部分。
1.先考察A句意,suggesting修饰前句没有问题,in the near future 修饰central bank 不对,应修饰整句。
For example, the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately associated with the legitimacy of opposing political parties.
选项B:Commerce—its profit-making, its self-interestedness, its individualism—became the enemy of these classical ideals.
选项E:动词和主语单复数不一致;所有格重复。
不能选the number of wolves,因为结合到后面的the number of prey来看,是根据被捕食的动物的数量来确定狼的数量,从逻辑上看不能是一只狼就吃一只动物,所以这里用size of population更合理。
4.21*38不是160亿美金吗?
按照答案来解释:问UDS是否能促进销量,目前两个城市销量一样的。那么我把UDS从两个城市都拿掉看看。此时两个城市供货量完全一致的,如果此时两个城市最终的销量产生了差异(比如说B比A高),那么就证明之前在A city的UDS放2倍的库存,其实是促进了A city的销量。
exceed,所以25
C选项错在,several improvements in blowing machinery前面的介词是不能省略的。因为,With charcoal's being replaced by coal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore中的with是独立主格的with,不是一个普通的介词,而several improvements in blowing machinery是一个纯名词,身前需要一个真正的介词。
c climate change 存在,krech的反驳是climate change 是一个影响因素,c增强了
已经有's了,前面就不需要those of了
6就在12里。。我在想些啥。。
!
两个条件都只能算出K,无法得知t
continued to promote the NIC path as the way for heavily indebted developing countries to proceed...heavily indebted developing是countries的修饰词吧。。文中只提到银行支持NIC这种方式并没说在经济上资助这种方式。另外unequaled 无与伦比的,无敌的