这种题。。。真的太虐了
C选项-A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest
that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
that从句还原后the economy might not be as weak as economy have been previously thought by some analysts
have应用has
同意,great job~
这个have thought不是analysts的谓语动词吗?
不是啊 这是done结构
恩恩,知道了
我觉得就算是has也不对吧,因为它只是说analysts之前预测的,单用一般过去时就可以了
good job
反正have是肯定不对的可以排除了
那c的as well as gesturing 是对的吗? as well as +doing 是一种用法,但是这里需要和made hand motion的时态平行吗?
没说相对价格高低,所以不能判定为相关因果
请问为什么A不对呢?他说V卖出4000,然后租的比卖的多,那不就说明V 的租赁抢了C的租赁吗?
C这个地方的整个video出租量都下降了, Video rental outlets in 【Centerville together】handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. 【The decline in rentals 】was probably due almost entirely to ,V的出租量本来就包含在整个出租量里边。
新开的Videorama是在C这个地区的,所以减少的10000里也包括Videorama的rentals
Thx!
mark
Thx
提问!老师,为什么B不可以呢?B取非之后不是可以削弱方案的可行性吗?取非之后是,许多manager仍然认为只有管理层才能做决定,那就使得方案没法儿实行,那员工的productivity也不会提高……
没提到employee什么事儿
Ron给的例子感觉也可以解释,信被写的时间和数量超过没有关系。
my brother, who ate bagel bites for breakfast every single day of his high school career, graduated in 1994. --> correct; his eating bagel bites had no impact on his graduation date.
my brother ate bagel bites for breakfast every single day of his high school career, graduating in 1994. --> incorrect; these are two unrelated observations, but this construction erroneously implies some sort of relationship.
这个很赞!谢谢搬运~
棒棒哒解释。用comma+ing是表示和主句动作同时或者有一定因果关系。而这两个动作的毫无关系的,所以不能这样用。
这个解释靠谱
通过句子结构是否完整以及平行原则可以排除bcd
仔细去体会A的问题...outnumber的逻辑主语离这个动作真的是十万八千里 如果你去写这个句子你会这样写吗?
"would" can be used as a past-tense form of "will" -- for instance, i know that we will win translates into the past tense as i knew that we would win -- or to express a hypothetical situation that isn't true.
the easy way to eliminate (b) is to know that "would" is incorrect.
"would" can be used as a past-tense form of "will" -- for instance, i know that we will win translates into the past tense as i knew that we would win
the scientists did the studying., so, the modifier about studying should be as close as possible to "scientists".
("by the study of..." is problematic idiomatically as well.)
Still no, because "enabled" should still be used to describe an actual ability. I.e., if you wouldn't say that someone/something is able to do something, then you can't use "enabled" to express that idea, either.
many customers intending to buy our wine will mistakenly buy theirs instead.
意思是想要买MW的人会错买。
C 想表达的意思是DW做广告突出label,大家都认识DW,所以会买DW。
小米和vivo
* "with states opening..." is incorrect. when you have an -ING WITHOUT COMMA modifier, like this one, it's a RESTRICTIVE ("essential") modifier. this means that we're only talking about those states that are "opening their utility markets to competition", the implication being that only some states are doing so. the intended meaning is better conveyed by "as states open..."
只关注语法了,没关注意思,C的语法应该是没错的吧,但是逻辑意思是错的。
"between 1990 and 2000" describes the entire sentence that follows.
if you want this type of modifier to describe a noun, you have to put it after the noun.
If the noun has a timeframe attached to it, THEN any pronoun will carry that same timeframe
comma+noun这种modifier修饰的是之前一句话
首先排除DE:but是和and性质一样的连词 需要前后结构平行 A错在,having 逗号+v-ing表示这个动作由前面主语发出并且同时发生,但是这里的unregulated是50年前就开始的
第四遍错。。。呵呵哒啦
我真的不懂B with milky sap是个插入语ok 忽略不看。 后面的that修饰的是谁?难道不可以是euraisa吗 而实际应指代a herbaceous plant 所以不会显得指代有误吗? 对c选项,我觉得后面的displacing grasses是和having milky sap并列 而不是和gives mouth sores并列,这么理解为什么不对呢?
with milky sap插入语,that跳跃修饰herbaceous plant,最重要的就是这个平行结构gives和displaces平行,这个平行要靠理解句意判断了,使牛口腔溃疡,替换其他的草两个独立的事件共同作为定语修饰herbaceous plant,作为它的特征,rendering结果伴随状语。如果按照你的理解,displace也是伴随状语的话,那displace的伴随动作是跟随主语states have been invaded发生的,这就明显不符合逻辑了对吧。
哇 好开心被解答!谢谢妹子!在cr和sc都好经常看到你留言~~~超赞的!感谢!!!
漫漫考G路,且行且珍惜
我要被这个指代搞疯了,that可以跳跃修饰?我还在琢磨他到底修饰milky sap还是Eurasia,不是只有it they这种才能跳跃修饰吗,这个修饰原则我真的觉得好任性
还想请问一下小姐姐,现在分词做伴随状语,优先修饰的是靠近它的从句呢,还是主句啊,它的逻辑主语应该是主语主语还是从句主语呢?比心!感谢!
that可以跳跃修饰,其实这个修饰问题还是主要搞清楚修饰的对象的核心词是什么。像本题名词+介词+名词,这里的核心词应该是前面那个名词plant,而后面的那个介词+名词from Europe也是用来修饰前面那个名词plant的,后面那个从句也是用来修饰plant的,相当于这个plant有两个修饰成分。
这个问题我也很纠结,也有看到在从句里作伴随状语的例子。理论上所有的分词作状语修饰应该都是修饰主语的,不管是主句还是从句都是主语,至于是哪个主语,可能需要去从句义来判断了。希望能帮到你。
with milky sap是插入语,你就不用管它啦
懂了,其实指代这个问题语意是大于所谓就近原则的。这个伴随状语修饰哪个句子的问题我google了一下,看到有人说也是有就近原则的,代入这题来看,rendering伴随结果状语修饰that定语从句,逻辑上是说的通的,反而如果作为主句的伴随结果,就有点怪怪的,也给小姐姐参考一下,以后遇到这种题能拿来讨论~谢谢回复~辛苦啦!