B: Ron:you can't use 'that' in this sort of construction, because constructions using 'that of' (or other preposition after 'that') must have EXACTLY parallel structures. in other words, if the second half says 'that during 10,000 years', then the preceding half must say 'the growth of ___ during something else' (or some other time preposition, such as before or after, in place of during).
能不能这么理解 这里所有带逗号加ing的都修饰前一个clause的发生的表伴随,所以是不正确的,因此所有带ing的选项都不能选?
我也是这么排除的!看老师在下面的回复,觉得这样理解也可以。“现在分词短语在句末如果用逗号和主句隔开了,通常都是伴随状语。”
1/28∗(28+14+7+4+2+1)
= 1/28 ∗(2∗28) =2
= 2
回答 “不是”, 也是答案。。。
不管x是多少,只看1+2 被3整除
only include corp and nonecorp
(1)因为x为正整数, 根号x 不可能为 1.5, 2.5,3.5...
(1) x=3 是其中一个根
所以第一句话用的那个1.5cup是什么东西???
C选项如果去掉后半句的its,对吗?
我认为C选项就算去掉its,仍然还是不如E来的简洁。
因为整个句子的主语就是the health care company一个,没有异议,因此在原句主语明确的时候可以省略主语。
如:Those can be complete sentences, but certainly don't have to be.
再如:James tried to sneak back into the house at 5 a.m. without waking his parents, but climbed through a window directly into the room where his father was already getting dressed.
(例子来源:manhattan论坛)
谢谢你!提供的例句也有助于理解和掌握这个法则,我记住啦~
想问一下这句话Between 14,000 and 8,000 B.C. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.其中的uncovering...是副词修饰,began to melt 是会影响导致uncover,但是重点在后半句被人们占领,所以不能用to do吗?
the sum of the even integers from 102 to 200, inclusive指的是[102,200]偶数的和,不是第102个到200个偶数的和。不要被第一句first 50 positive even integers前50个带跑偏,注意看题!!
题目:ab≠ 0 --> a≠ 0 ,b≠ 0 ;(-a, b) and (-b, a) 同象限-->ab同号。问(-x, y) 是否同象限-->xy什么符号?
(1)xy > 0 --> xy同符号。但是不知道具体什么符号,insufficient
(2)ax > 0 --> ax同符号~abx同号。但是不知道y什么符号,insufficent
(1)+(2) abxy同符号 --> 可以判断是否同象限,sufficient
Now A is wrong as those can to refer carbon emissions or current trends that is illogical ; B is correct captures the meaning " that refers to a level"
(A) was the only one of the five-nation Iroquois League who sided ----one of somethings 后面something必须是复数,但是后面的five-nation Iroquois League 是单数,是一个联盟,所以是不对的
老师, inseparable逻辑上应该修饰emotions,可是如果按照B选项换成定语从句以后变成了修饰phenomena,这样逻辑上是否有错误?谢谢。
同问这个点。
其他选项都能理解,也都能理解是错的。但是 B 这样就修饰“社会现象”,逻辑上是否有错呢?
因为前面是主系表结构,emotions就是phenomena,所以that后面修饰phenomena其实跟修饰emotions没啥区别
E:sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what中的 what 去掉是不是也是对的啊
我觉得应该是对的,
个人觉得不行,如果拿掉了what,就变成sales和trade group比了。欢迎讨论!
同问 what可以去掉吗?
what不可以去掉。比较对象是sales 。 what引导名词性从句,意思是以前预测的sales。
是不是应该是they each does somethin呀,还是they each do something
我感觉会不会是 would的原因 they WOULD each DO?
应该是would的原因
曼哈顿写了 应该是They each do
each of sth 采用单数
这题好郁闷呀。 DE第一点不同: D 是 have the ability of doing, E 是 be capable of doing.(啰嗦不算错,二者都是正确的);第二处不同, D is considered as; E is considered (这里我觉得一般是加介词as 的,我选了D);第三处不同D 中 have the ability of recognizing and spontaneously grasping, E的 be capable of doing and of spontaneously grasping, E 的平行标注的更加明显。
这里选了E。
我记得曼哈顿说过consider as gmat不接受
consider不用加as 直接就是considerA B
discrepancy是指为什么manufacturing的productivity增长了,而service sector的productivity下降。budget的explanation是说因为interest rate的上升导致的,第三段第一句说道利率越低,投资越好,productivity就高,而现在service sector的productivity低就是因为利率高造成的。E选项正确在于,它说道利率贵manufacturing和service sector的影响是一样的,也就是不会出现一个growth了另一个却decline,就weaken了budget这个解释