这道题没有看懂new policy是什么意思。。。Mark~
觉得是果因
状语是用来修饰动词的特性或特征的
选了c。
Only if身后不跟虚拟语气。标记一下~
这道题错了两次,标记一下。
In a similar sense, the reason the threshold of viability has not changed in this problem has nothing to do with the price of oil, but instead has to do with how cost-effective solar power is relative to oil power. C does this by providing a scenario in which efficiency increases in solar power are balanced by efficiency increases in oil power.
反身代词不能独立做主语,只能作主语的同位语。Mark~
第一個原因: 沒有創造力是因為超過40歲
削弱use automobile transportation instead——not paying the hidden costs
加强new managerial techniques——improve employee productivity
这道题我错误地选了B.
相关--因果类型,选项A排除了反向即抑郁导致吸烟,则加强
D可以认为是独立主格吗?
D选项错在哪里?不可以用many吗?