本题的关键在于comparison的对称性,句子的意思是要把trade imbalances和trade deficit做对比。BCD选项都是把trade imbalances和U.S.做对比,E是把trade imbalances和record exports做对比,都是不对称的。
B选项通过取非:Kitchen不会冠名其他产品。→ Kitchen会冠名其他产品,而前提只有专家保证the cookware这个产品,其它产品没有被保证,那么其它产品可能会损坏Kitchen声誉(形成第三要素)。
如果说B的取非推论太多,那么对比C,“若其它厨具发现这个杂志不再有吸引力了,那么将不会在这个杂志上投放广告“这句也是推论呀,其它厨具认为Kitchen不再有吸引力不一定就不会投放广告呀 【比如:毕竟Kitchen对老百姓(也就是Kitchen的消费者)有吸引力呀】
请毕老师指出我的问题:(
我也是这么想的。。。exactly the same...
老师,到底哪里错了?
我觉得C比B直接 C直接就点明attractive了,而B还要从质量开始推
daylight visibility (down) if distance 【equator】(up)
accidents (down) if law (with)
most importantly:【any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries(countries farther from the equator)】
so: law->lower rate of accident & the decrease will be more significant if the distance from the equator to the country widens.
as we know: USAso Laws do more in those countries than in USA
思路:调查中有80%的人愿意为铁路系统的扩张缴纳更多的税,目的是使告诉没那么拥堵;但这个调查结果也同时说明了铁路扩张并不会减轻高速拥堵状况,因为——这些人的想法都是铁路扩张后别人就会去使用铁路,自己使用高速路就会没那么拥堵了。
我有关注到一个点:题目有句话是the poll results contain an indication that ,那么原因也往这个调查中去找。
这道题我错误地选了B.
分析B选项,“up to”应该本身没有问题吧?错误在于,bears后面应当跟定语从句而不是伴随状语?因为修饰的是bears而不是一种状态。
B选项,我是通过Sentence Structure有问题排除的。semi colon后面应该是一个完整的句子,错在无Subject的 Fragment
A选项是不是因为they指代不同,所以错了?
B选项分号后面缺少主语,你说得对!A选项出现they和them,指代不明,我是这么排除掉的。“它们找它们”,这种表达方式是有问题的。
我的理解是,如果按照intended meaning,翻译过来是“灰熊翻开石头找蛾”,但是,一个句子中出现了同一个代词,they,不同指代对象。这个就Ambitious了。印象里,貌似没有出现过一个句子有两个以上的代词的,是不是就是因为会指代不清??你有没有遇到过一个句子出现两个以上代词的情况?
听完RON的视频,我懂了。
当选项中出现代词保留了原有指代名词,代词是考点。
IF you see a pronoun taken out and replaced by a specific noun, you should strongly suspect that the pronoun is incorrect. (although you should still check the pronoun rules)This is intended to mean “moths”, but it can’t (because “moth” appears as the singular form)
代词的指代肯定是考点,通常出现代词的,需要在句中找到对应的清晰的指代对象。你问我有没有遇到过句子出现两个以上代词,一下子想不起来例子耶...出现形式主语的算不算?形式主语当中的"It"不存在指代问题。
针对这个句子,我的理解是:同一个代词肯定不能指代两种事物哇。Otherwise it'd be ambiguous, as you said.
突然想到,代词的指代不清甚至不是绝对错误,不能上来直接排除,得先看句子结构和成分。代词和其指代对象的单复数不一致属于重大语法错误。
Got it! 等我看看以后会不会再碰到一个句子,出现两个一样的代词的题目。嗯。分享一下SC做题心得,顺序可以是:1)Intended Meaning What is What? What is modified? 2)Is it a Sentence(Runon or Fragment)3)What are the Splits(Find the basic ones such as Agreement,Parallelism,Modifier,Pronoun, and verb tense)4)Reread to check if there is redundancy or Ambiguity
Thanks for sharing! I always put grammatical construction(i.e. sentence structure) and logical prediction in the first place, and then to look at agreement, parallelism, verb forms etc, and the last is to pay attention to diction, idiom and rhetorical construction.
同一个代词不能指代两种事物,就像同一个句子不能出现两个主语,否则破坏Parallelism了。
比如这道:To Josephine Baker, Paris was her home long before it was fashionable to be an expatriate, and she remained in France during the Second World War as a performer and an intelligence agent for the Resistance.
不知道这么类比恰不恰当,感觉其实所谓的RULE最终都化为了Whether this sentence‘ s meaning make sense or not?
你是不是二刷这道题了哈哈~同意你说哒,在句子改错里,所谓语法规则应该都是为了表意精确服务的。
不是哈哈!是做那道题时想到这里来了。话说同学你是在美国考G嘛
不是哎,我在国内考呢~原来你是时差党;)
并不哈哈 我也是在国内考
加油加油,祝早日杀G成功!刚发现这题被我俩的讨论霸屏了,也是棒啊哈哈~
哈哈!同祝杀G成功!BTW,安利一个帖子:https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-739174-1-1.html
感谢分享!帖子拜读啦,作者高屋建瓴,确实发人深省,我要多看几遍。我安利一个:gmatclub论坛,上面的verbal题讨论也能带来启发。
C 分词要么伴随,要么结果;要是是结果,感觉很奇怪;但是如果是伴随,个人感觉又会歧义,到底是修饰items, equipment, 还是主语?
A同位语从句,前面item不是一种方法,
C 逗号v-ing在句尾做结果或伴随状语,修饰的是前面整个clause
再次错了!尴尬的要死 AE 纠结!
based on 句首修饰comma后面的第一个名词,则A就成了学者基于accounts 逻辑错误
D 呢
Luci, you are missing a nuance in the meaning of the sentence that is difficult even for a native speaker of English to identify. An individual would not be the former chair of a planning board for 18 consecutive years; instead, the sentence is attempting to say that Joan was actully the chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and that she attended these meetings during those 18 years. Thus, choices A, B, and C and be eliminated. As D is a run on sentence, E is the best answer.
我用的因果推理,我觉得不选A的原因是,结论说的是save time,而A中说的是save money,节省成本这个前提的特征不能推出后面的结论,所以错误
if you use the infinitive "to make", then the computer company is still the subject of the sentence. therefore, in this case you have to use the reflexive pronoun: itself. as an analogy, i can't look at me in the mirror, but i can look at myself in the mirror. same deal.
D中的it改成itself是不是更好
800学生是at a certain college
(1)可能还有公司没表态呢。。。?
26^5+26^4=26^5+26^4
=26*26^4+26^4=26^4(26+1)=27(26^4)
赞!
product是乘积
我想问一下,这道题如果把这个划线部位整体向后挪,挪到have这个动作做出来以后,是否就可以加上Have这个动作?
哥们,你知道E为什么错吗?
难道是因为they指代有问题?
是因为 they 指代同一个 officials, 语义不对的
明白了,谢谢!
more babies were born to women over the age of thirty than more babies were born to women under it.
"over the age of 30" and "under it" are exactly parallel elements,