benevolence竟然是善意的意思 以为是暴力的意思。。。
问题为这帮科学家最终可能会有以下哪个结论,再次定位到最后一段,文章的论点。发现最后一句说的和选项都无关,只能再往前一句看看,找到conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms.只有选项B符合。这种反复回原文看的题,还是挺浪费时间的。如果时间不足,可以换个思路做题,最后一句就是说谁比谁早的,选项中也只有B是说谁比谁早的。
思考为什么打了麻醉的犀牛生育率会低,B说的只是犀牛而C带上了打了麻醉的犀牛
读题要仔细啊
insignificant词意理解反了
insignificant理解反了
条件2看成了2n的因子数是n的两倍。。
要把这个逻辑加强就得补充 是因为这个新政 - 富人捐钱少了 - 慈善机构都不行啦。我错选 B,B 只是说富人是主要来源,但是没有说他们会捐少啊,逻辑链少一环。
不明白C错在哪了
如何明确快速的判断倒装?
grow当 变得 讲 是系动词 后面加形容词 如:grow older
(E) million as part of a deal that will make (as part of a deal修饰前面整个句子it will purchase the division for $$;that用限定定语修饰deal,避免D中the company做主语需要反身代词的情况;will make和前面的will purchase时态呼应,正确答案)
(C) million, part of a deal making (同位语的错误同B;making表示the deal is making it the largest xxx at the time when the company will purchase the division, 时态不匹配,应该都用将来时;另外说下 a part of a deal 和part of a deal都可以对;)
(A) million, which is part of a deal that will make (这个错误不用多说,which只能修饰前面紧接的部分,这里是$950 million,doesn't make any sense since $$ is not a part of a deal here, the purchase is a part of the deal)
additional
Western designers', artists', and crafters' imitations 加上所有格才对
in the workplace 状语,缩小了描述范围。
(adv.) I whereby saw that he was angry. 由此我看出他生气(了。
毕老师,为什么a的reducing是伴随状语,而不是event的定语呢?even 是可以分为两类的“能减少数量的event”和“不能减少数量的event”,所以这里应该用限制性定语。
我估计老师是懒得解释,所以直接解释成了伴随状语,当然语法上没问题,也是句子意思错。