6/5 19/5
第二段说resin功能到底是驱赶还是吸引虫子?Fraenkel说:一开始nonspecific,后来specific,但是,一些虫子会overcome repellent,变成attracted。这样:rein会导致虫子feed on those plants。然后提出specialized discipline of chemical ecology,后面定语从句用and连接了plant antiherbivore chemistry。
做题的时候,从关键词plant antiherbivore chemistry开始,原文能看出这个和前面的东西是并列修饰一个什么ecology的,再往前找,原来是一个什么ideas导致了这个ecology,再往前,就能看到feeding相关的东西。这时候已经晕了。
看选项:
小哥哥真可爱。我也是这样晕的。。
哈哈哈,希望我写出来对别人都帮助~
解题错误
判断题 可以不可以
坑:positive integer
C:人们应该避免食用人工脂肪。
P:人工脂肪吸收必要的维生素,阻止这些维生素被人体所使用。
A选项如果是肯定的话,即摄入维生素可以弥补人工脂肪带来的不利影响,那么推出的结论是“人们可以食用人工脂肪”,否定了原结论。
A选项如果是否定的话,即摄入维生素不可以弥补人工脂肪带来的不利影响,那么推出的结论是“人们应该避免食用人工脂肪”,肯定了原结论。
这道题的关键是要找到columnist position到底是什么,注意不是artificial 发fat has a serious drawback.
11个月的均值
wrong: i've always wanted to jump out of a plane, but i've never had the chance to do it. --> this is wrong because the only possible antecedent for "it" is plane, and it doesn't make any sense to talk about "doing" a plane.
correct: i've always wanted to jump out of a plane, but i've never had the chance to do so. --> "do so" = jump out of a plane.
perhaps the most common usage in which you'll see this is "do it" vs. "do so"
he rule i like to use here is this: if it's not a specific NOUN that can be replaced by a PRONOUN (usually "it"), then use the all-purpose replacement "...so".
如果非要还原我觉得是more marital satisfaction than those who retired completely,
曲解题意
choice a does just that: it says that the new pollution-control equipment will create a new market, which will then offset the loss of the old markets.
the passage goes from
'the loss of some export markets'
to
'annual exports of ... goods will ... diminish'
that's a logical leap. in particular, the hidden assumption is that no other export markets will step up to take the place of the ones that will be lost. if we can find an answer choice that contradicts this assumption, we can weaken the argument.
坑:cubic
老师这边AB的without可以看作定语吗,由于定语的就近修饰原则,withoutadequate amountsof sleep修饰people's newly acquired skills,但是skill肯定是不会缺睡眠的,所以错。这种解释合理吗?
英文表达好奇怪,加一个however,以为是说和前面的推断:没人受影响相反,有人失业,问为啥。。想骗了。。
这个倡议者本以为收船税不会增加任何人的经济负担,however,这个税导致部分工人下岗。应该是有转折的意思吧
推断题目是必须能从文段中100%推出,任何小于100%可能性的答案都不可以。当然更不能加入任何主观信息和任何文章中没有提到的信息。
本题,最重要的是文段中的第一句话,这句话读懂了,自然可以选出A。
本文有三个facts:
Fact1:Parasitic wasps lay their eggs directly into the eggs of various host insects in exactly the right numbers for any suitable size of host egg. 寄生蜂可以根据寄主蛋的尺寸,下刚好数量的蛋。
这也就是A选项所说的,可以根据寄生蜂的下蛋行为来判断寄主蛋的尺寸。
最大公约数
the time required for a stroke is exactly equal to the time interval between strokes
老师 明白为什么选C 但D选项不是很理解 为什么不能反驳呢 是不是因为不能单纯上来反驳结论 而是要用推理 谢谢老师
D是说It could not have been the case that some birds were descended from one of the birdlike dinosaur species and other birds from another. 意思是以下情况是不可能,那些情况是某些鸟类是进化自某一种鸟状恐龙的,其它的是进化自另外一种鸟状恐龙。意思是所有鸟类都是进化自一种鸟状恐龙,所以如果是这样,加上文段中这句话There are bird fossils that are much older than the earliest birdlike dinosaur fossils that have been found有鸟类化石比鸟状恐龙化石,不是正好证明了结论-即鸟类不可能是从鸟状恐龙进化来的吗?
老师,我也选的是D,当然C也是对的,能解释下为什么选了C,而没有选D吗?
D是说It could not have been the case that some birds were descended from one of the birdlike dinosaur species and other birds from another. 意思是以下情况是不可能,那些情况是某些鸟类是进化自某一种鸟状恐龙的,其它的是进化自另外一种鸟状恐龙。意思是所有鸟类都是进化自一种鸟状恐龙,所以如果是这样,加上文段中这句话There are bird fossils that are much older than the earliest birdlike dinosaur fossils that have been found有鸟类化石比鸟状恐龙化石,不是正好证明了结论-即鸟类不可能是从鸟状恐龙进化来的吗?
老师,我也选的是D,当然C也是对的,能解释下为什么选了C,而没有选D吗?
顺便说一句,讲解里的D翻译有些小失误。
翻译出了点小错,但是我不认为影响了选择。首先你的推理里面有一些漏洞,不可能的事情是:“某些鸟来自一种恐龙,剩下的来自另一种”,这个事情并不能推理出“所有鸟都来自同一种恐龙”这个结论,也有可能“每一种鸟来自每一种不同恐龙啊”。题目的因果是“化石年代先后”和“证明谁是谁的后代”之间的因果关系,这个选项明显脱离了这个因果,如老师所讲,无论它进化来自几种恐龙,可能或者是不可能,这个与谁是谁的后代没有太多的关系。
有道理,D离推出结果需要一些演绎的成分,主要就是戏太多!