想起了ron讲过的，他说是否考代词指代，主要看答案里是否同一个代词或者名词给出了不同的选项差别，“大多数”时候当题目给出了代词的选项，但是还有其他选项用了名词，基本可以排出代词选项了，意为判断代词肯定指代有问题了。

马克。

虽然做对了，但需要马克下

因果推理：

因：jobs created has been higher than that year's average pay for jobs citywide
果： average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

C削弱结论，高工资已经被排除了

因果推理，
因：cast-brass jewelry sent to Benin's king from neighboring Ife
果：nowledge of brass casting not derived from the Portuguese.
C因果无联系加强结论

the intensity of the light is 30 candles给出了S值，the light特指前文的a light that has an intensity of 60 candles. 读题能力待加强！！

老师，问一下B里面The greatest road system was incan highway，后面的over是状语，and连接was和extended也就是说，最伟大的道路系统延伸至xxxx，也就是B，为什么是不对的呢

d选项不知错在哪里

同求with的作用

这里的while是不是也是错误的？因为前后两件事并不是同时发生的

A中的having been name 表达了一种先时性，使“被命名”早于“被发现”，违背逻辑，可以这样理解吗？

在A/B之间还是选了B，司机数量的多少不也是影响结果的么。。。。

(the correct way to say this would be "the time at which we were scheduled to meet", since the preposition "at" must be conserved.)

E: if you say "the last day that they are scheduled to collect", this means that "day" must be a direct object.
this makes no sense, unless the employees are collecting days.
"the time that we were scheduled to meet" is incorrect. the literal reading of this (which is the only reading you care about, by the way) is that you were scheduled to meet the time itself.

为什么人可以was injured？那不就是人被受伤了么？

请问except可以作连词吗？

错选了c，定位文中可以看到presumably not all through human consumption，k的态度不是全盘否定人类对灭绝的作用的。Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change。不同意m排除了气候变化的影响。观点的句子一定要看仔细。

其实是一个小的考古的推理：结论：不是人类搞死他们的哦 支持的原因：发现大型动物的地方没有人类hunt的痕迹 这种考古的最好的削弱就是有个什么发现使得之前全部否定的说法不成立。