因果推理,
因:cast-brass jewelry sent to Benin's king from neighboring Ife
果:nowledge of brass casting not derived from the Portuguese.
C因果无联系加强结论
the intensity of the light is 30 candles给出了S值,the light特指前文的a light that has an intensity of 60 candles. 读题能力待加强!!
老师,问一下B里面The greatest road system was incan highway,后面的over是状语,and连接was和extended也就是说,最伟大的道路系统延伸至xxxx,也就是B,为什么是不对的呢
and extended的部分更应该用来做状语修饰有2500miles这个长度,而不是用来和前面毫无关联的内容并列。
我在实际做题的时候当时还不能体会到句子中的逻辑关系,谢谢你啦!
fine,浅见,望共同进步
共同进步!
d选项不知错在哪里
我认为e选项中的独立主格结构很好地修饰了前面主句蜂刺的状态,作状语;而d选项只是简单的并列,没有体现出这种修饰关系,即导致蜜蜂致命的并非是the heavily barbed stinger。
同求with的作用
simultaneously with but independently of,对我来说有一种并列的感觉
这里的while是不是也是错误的?因为前后两件事并不是同时发生的
A中的having been name 表达了一种先时性,使“被命名”早于“被发现”,违背逻辑,可以这样理解吗?
在A/B之间还是选了B,司机数量的多少不也是影响结果的么。。。。
(the correct way to say this would be "the time at which we were scheduled to meet", since the preposition "at" must be conserved.)
E: if you say "the last day that they are scheduled to collect", this means that "day" must be a direct object.
this makes no sense, unless the employees are collecting days.
"the time that we were scheduled to meet" is incorrect. the literal reading of this (which is the only reading you care about, by the way) is that you were scheduled to meet the time itself.
为什么人可以was injured?那不就是人被受伤了么?
人应该就是被受伤啊,不然是自己伤害自己吗...
请问except可以作连词吗?
错选了c,定位文中可以看到presumably not all through human consumption,k的态度不是全盘否定人类对灭绝的作用的。Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change。不同意m排除了气候变化的影响。观点的句子一定要看仔细。
其实是一个小的考古的推理:结论:不是人类搞死他们的哦 支持的原因:发现大型动物的地方没有人类hunt的痕迹 这种考古的最好的削弱就是有个什么发现使得之前全部否定的说法不成立。
E选项,which指代的是a broad area of high pressure 而不是两个事件。根据常识,高气压能产生干燥晴朗天气,而Gusty westerly winds则与之无关。
对的,地理上也说了
那就没办法排除 A 了吧 T T
找Bohr理论的学弱项,Bohr说:第二段最后一句话 he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment. 说明量子物质其实在实验观察前就已经被破坏。E选项说量子物质与欧持续不变的物理形态,不会因为实验方法而改变,对Bohr理论进行了削弱
Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate,
因果推理:
因:jobs created has been higher than that year's average pay for jobs citywide
果: average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
C削弱结论,高工资已经被排除了