you can say "interactions between other tribes", but "X interacted between other tribes" is wrong. (note that this part of the sentences follows tribes who interacted...)
by the same token, you can't use "X interacted among other tribes", either.
关于this:
it's incorrect to use "this" as a STANDALONE PRONOUN. i.e., you cannot write something like "this, combined with her talent for writing, made her..."
however, "this" as an ADJECTIVE (the way in which it is used here, in front of the noun "vantage point") is just fine, and is quite exceedingly common.
the intended meaning is that the horny jaws play the role of teeth, which is the correct interpretation of 'function as teeth'.
i.e.,
function as teeth --> they work as an acceptable substitute for teeth
function as teeth do --> they work in the same way as teeth do - same mechanics, same action, etc. this is not what is meant.
老师,对比B和D选项,it和this都只能指代单数名字,所以如果this不对,那么it也不对啊~逻辑主语是复数名词provisions或者动词provide,都表示事件。
我觉得是因为B里面it指代的是new maritime code ,而D中this指代的是provisions of the new maritime code;这里让我比较不确定的一点是 我感觉 “海商法刺激”和“海商法的条款刺激”似乎都说得通
老师,我想问一下,比如这道题:..........provisions of the new maritime code, which/it/this.中 which/it/this 可不可能指代the new maritime code?
可以的。
楼上回答的挺好。it就指代code啊。
好的,理解了,谢谢!同意,从题目看来,“海商法”,或者“海商法的条款”,或者“海商法/海商法的条款提供了......依据这件事”都能够“刺激”,就看那句话里面说的是“法”还是“条款“还是”提供依据“这件事了
老师,我觉得楼上的同学的这个问题,“比如这道题:..........provisions of the new maritime code, which/it/this.中 which/it/this 可不可能指代the new maritime code?”,这个是不可以的。
因为如果可以,那么D选项中的那个this就可以指代the new maritime code,而不是一定必须指代provisions of the new maritime code了。如果是这样的话,那么D选项就对了。
老师!句子改错-语法推理精讲, 书上写的是“ there be 句型的核心词是个例外,它的核心词时期后面的第一个名词。"此题不应该是provisions, 怎么这个句子的核心词是”有"呢, 能解释一下吗?
我觉得provisions和new maritime code刺激都说的通...感觉很含糊,找了好久也没看到真正能一锤定音说服我的解释
毕老师到后面还是没回复你么...我觉得你问的很对啊,如果this能指代provisions of the new maritime code中的the new maritime code,那D选项不是和B选项一样了吗,还怎么用this这个点去排除啊,这显然前后矛盾了