That many terrestrial snakes in similar spatial orientations do not experience this kind of circulatory failure suggests that certain adaptations enable them to regulate blood pressure more effectively in those orientations.第二段最后一句。之后第三段写了one adaption,and another adaption
1-根据定语从句就近修饰的原则,the number of which修饰的是recovery area,显然跑偏了意思,AD排除;
2-E,是个when引导的时间状语从句,变成scheduled to take over发生的时间条件,句意不对;排除;
3-剩下BC,关键点是however不是连词,是副词,不能连接两个完整的句子,只能是B对了
为什么和陶瓷不能并列呢?
所有选项有个split点,immune from /to:
immune from : 免于,免于 claims,taxation等;
immune to: 对..免疫;
这题里面显然应该用后者,排除ABD;在C和E里面选,C的时态有问题,所以选E;
不知道 immune from/to的这个差别,错了:(。。。
觉得有点像因果推理
老师求更新,表是啥
二杀错。又选了c。 choice c: 'the 35 years since' implies that the present is 35 years after the release date. not only does this conflict with the meaning of the original, but it also renders the past perfect (from the underlined part) inappropriate: you'd need present perfect in this case. also, since the release is a point event, it would belong in the simple past.
为什么是is而不是was呢
未能理解排除A、B、E的理由。
请问,A,E选项中的 that which they would normally eat、B选项中的what they would normally eat,
分别与 a diet that they would normally eat 有什么不同呢?
关键是,在than的后面,不是that they would normally eat,而是they would normally eat。
未能解惑。
- 比较对象是【少30%卡的diet】和【平时吃的diet】,【they would normally eat】的核心词是eat,diet 怎么能和 eat 进行比较呢?
-【a diet that they would normally eat】【that which they would normally eat】【what they would normally eat】三个用法的不同之处在哪里呢?
最合理的比较行为或许是diet,但也可以比较“正常吃”这个行为啊,因为这个行为本身就对应了diet。这就类似于,I eat more apples than you do一样,最合理的比较对象肯定是苹果数量,但我也可以认为是吃这个行为的发生次数呀。
恩,明白了,diet 和 they would normally eat 可以比较。
那么 diet 和 A、B、E选项中的 【that which they would normally eat】、【what they would normally eat 】为什么不能比较呢?
比较的不是diet,而是卡路里的含量。
老师在解析中也说了具有fewer calories than关系的两者应该是a diet和a diet that they would normally eat,所以比较的对象应该是diet才对啊。。。
同问
个人感觉可以先通过语义排除B和E(不能用though而是要用but),然后再用but平行排除A和C。
我也错选了C--现在我在想,是不是如果把C 选项中的removing改成removal,就说的通了? C是错在名词结构不对称:the removal应该对应the clearning就没问题了.
问题问的是the difference in the amount of cratering。第二段陈述了是因为geological activity的程度, Io is extremely geologically active, Europa seems to be active on a more modest scale, and Ganymede has undergone bouts of activity in its geological past. Only Callisto reveals no geological activity.
is related more positively to post acquisition success than retaining lower-ranked top executives.原文中说高级管理者比低级管理者和后期收购成功更相关,c选项是反着说:对于后期收购成功来说,低级管理者不如高级管理者重要。
Although from the UEP position it seems sensible to retain less tenured executives and allow more tenured ones to leave, such a strategy appears to lower the probability of acquisition success.作者不同意UEP的观点,就是双方会disagree的
Bergh conducted a study of executive retention and acquisition outcome第二段开头句B做的,就是前面research limited的。
为什么“水乳胶球”和“陶瓷器“不能并列呢?画作的最终呈现的物品是陶瓷器啊,而且这个陶瓷器也有关于画作的定语。
“水乳胶球”和“有画作的陶瓷器” 证明了事实 感觉也说得通啊,为什么C不对呢?
感觉C不对是因为found at San Lorenzo应该修饰ceramics
给结论找原因,结论是 double their profits per acre ,即每亩利润翻一倍;
已知一个前提 Corn will produce lower yields per plant,即每株植物的产量下降;
现在要出一个理由在产量下降的情况下,利润还要翻倍。
A.减少costly的成本,可以实现利润增加;
B.因为题干已经说了产量下降,长高也没用,不能增加利润;
C.增加肥料成本,减少利润
D.每亩产量=每亩植株数*每株植物的产量,每亩植株数将近增加2倍,但是每株植物产量下降,未给出下降多少,如果产量下降一半,则不影响每亩产量,不能使利润翻倍;
E.休耕期增加,减少利润。
经比较A和D两个选项,A选项更优。
gas and electric company是一家公司…… "to create a huge marketing network for the utilities"
"to create a huge network for marketing the utilities" 前者核心词错
比较对象一致
逻辑论元……
这不应该是果因推理吗?
同问
开头第一句说的是likely,意味着TV station的收入在逻辑时间点上是晚与后面的,所以 应该是因果推理