误选C,后半句对前半句是修饰作用,故C错。
fewer 可数;less 不可数。比较对象一致,结构类似。those是copy代词,ones是同一群人。
如果改动很少就能纠正错误,就别大改如DE,容易改变句意。
这个解释里面是不是错了,A选项的解释说 “另外, all their fellows和 a close relative不搭配。不能是所有它们的伙伴是一个近亲。” , 但是正确答案D中,就是这么表达的呀,“ the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives ”, B, C选项的错误只有similar 这个点吧,E选项的错误是limit的单复数弄错了吧,应该是limit,
我觉得解释的意思应该是,fellows和a不搭配吧?一个是复数一个是单数。D里面就全是复数。
答案是c
答案应该是c
E: From Option E we can infer that if a state is spending lot of money on roads then it has inadequate road systems. If the state's road condition had improved because of the amount of money invested by the state, then after say 3 or 4 years the state's spending on road system should have decreased. But the question stem says that this state has been spending more than other states from the past 6 years. So, there is a good chance that the roads of this state are still in a bad state.
A: The question stem says that this state is spending more money per mile compared to other states. This amount is relative to the amount of money spent by other states. But, the statement doesn't say whether the money that was spent by this state was sufficient to get the road system to a adequate condition.
老师,同样问,这是2个年份的价格做比较,而不是2个年份比较,比的价格,所以应该用所有格,为什么不是据此判断呢?
老师,Ving短语和that从句在修饰名词时有什么区别?如果C中protect改成protects,那么B和C谁更好?
原来是so....that结构啊,没看到。
just as....so
in which 里的which不是应该就近指代cuts and sprains么,怎么感觉解析的意思是指代到inflammatory response
题目有隐含条件x+y=1,没考虑到,做错了。
E除了时态错误,well established修饰有问题吗?
修饰不清,可以修饰extraction也可以是method
因为and在未划线部分,就默认了both使用的正确性,这是不对的!
是的,并不是每个and都有both陪着。
C选项 to be able 表示将来,逻辑错误;D,its ability变成具体指代,不合逻辑
为什么不是果因推理呀
相关因果其实是果因的一个特殊类型
特殊在哪里内
我觉得是他们的答案特征相似,都是同时提及两者or给出一个他因。
但是相关因果的CQ更多更细分(多了因果间接性和因果方向)
a group collectively known as the subprime lending market是borrowers的同位语。这样说不对,a group collectively known as the subprime lending market是“borrowers with proven records of not paying back their loans on time”的同位语。