* the modifier doesn't make sense. since "(thus) restricted" functions as an adjective, this modifier (like all other adjectival modifiers) tags onto the preceding noun. therefore, this sentence is saying that adulthood is confined to deeper bodies of water, a nonsense statement.
* unidiomatic use of "until".
you can't say "you'll take X amount of time UNTIL..."
UNTIL is used after a description of an action: i will run until i become exhausted.
the correct idiomatic expression is "you'll take X amount of time to VERB," as used in the correct choice.
实际上，伴随所表达的因果是一种自然而然的因果，例如：
Jack kicked the post, feeling pain.
“感觉疼痛”是“杰克踢杆子”的自然而然的结果，所以“感觉疼痛”用了伴随状语来表达。但在本选项中，“实际上可以做温度计”显然不是“叫声随着温度而变化”的自然而然的结果，因此不能用伴随状语来表达。
C选项 monkfish前面没加冠词，要用复数
2. 关于monkfish, fish的单复数识别：
if "fish" is singular, it must be used WITH AN ARTICLE ("a", "the", etc.)
i saw a fish swimming beneath me --> singular (1 fish)
i saw fish swimming beneath me --> plural (multiple fish)
句子中 as there are for cod and haddock是插入语，
主干是There are no legallimits on the size of monkfish that can becaught。
1、 a circumstance 是同位语。
2、 B、E里面都已经有contribute to 了。导致什么什么。用because有点多此一举了吧。而且B里面有being，这个GMAT中几乎全错，除了偶尔偶尔的几道对。
A项Although引导的让步状语从句出现了she，主句开头必须马上出现这个人（Barbara Jordan）；后面as it was中it指代不明
C项错误同A，如果which修饰Nixon，后面说不通，impeachment也不能be televised，可判断which修饰hearings的可能性最大
D项then also later重复啰嗦
E项错误同D
OA: Trans World Entertainment Corporation announced it was closing up to one fourth of its stores.
Here, Trans World is reporting information about itself.
As a result, it is permissible to omit that after the reporting verb announced.
In most cases on the GMAT, a reporting verb such as announced will be followed by that.
This SC -- which is from GMATPrep -- illustrates an important exception to this rule:
When a subject is reporting information about ITSELF, the GMAT may omit that from the noun-clause serving as the direct object of the reporting verb.
The typical construction is as follows:
SUBJECT + REPORTING VERB + it + VERB.
Here, announced to be closing is unidiomatic.
Worse, the implication of to be closing is that Trans World Entertainment Corporation (the preceding subject) is about TO BE CLOSING.
Not the intended meaning.
The intended meaning is that UP TO ONE-FOURTH OF THE STORES will be closing.
Eliminate D.
扫描二维码，直接登录
这道题虽然A选项最能解释雇佣者是不会争抢大学生，但是我越想这个因果关系越不对，如果说 有更大比重的有大学文凭的学生选择了没有什么技术性的工作，那么1980到1990这段时间，这些有文凭的学生收入比较少，而且这个收入少的学生群体越来越大，那么整个有文凭的学生群体应该是平均收入慢慢减少的，应该是和没有文凭的人平均收入差减少了，怎么是文中说的doubled呢？
我跟你想的一模一样，就是想不明白A怎么能导致题目中的前提事实！真是不明白
是对的啊，从A项正着推回去就会削弱题目中的信息，不就是weaken吗
没有技术的工作，题目中没有说就收入不高，可能是找不到对口的工作，不需要很多技术的工作，可能工资与其他能力挂钩，也可能的多的。
是不是他因，1980年没有形成double工资的原因是因为工作不匹配，人不能尽其能，而不是因为竞争激烈，因此削弱题干结论