果因推理:
先出现结果-sea otter数量下降
解释原因- orcas were the cause
切入点:CQ1-其他因素 CQ2-因果联系 ; 选项要么给出sea otter下降的其他原因,要么提及sea otter&orca之间的关系
错选了E 但是逻辑中的两个主体应该是orcas和sea otter,而seal不是
被提问句中的orcas will eat otters when seals are unavailable 迷惑了
P:
背景-CO2和甲烷都会影响大气层内的热量排放,造成全球变暖。
方案推理-燃烧甲烷供电可以减少全球变暖效应
O:反对-甲烷燃烧也会释放CO2(上述方案的一个副作用)
问题:most adequately counter the objections 即反对Objection➡️ 加强P
答案应当涉及上述方案 burn methane - reduce global warming
转:设x用了x天做w个 y用了x-2天 则x一天做w\x,y一天w\(x-2)
3天x,y一起做了
3(w\x+w\(x-2))=5\4w
解方程 约掉w
12\x+12\(x-2)=5
化为整式方程得到(5x-4)(x-6)=0
x1=0.8 x2=6
检验两个都符合原方程但是x1不符合实际
所以x为6
所以x做2w用12天 选e
The usage of that after expected requires a subject and production cannot be the subject for it..
production is expected that it will almost double by the end of the year.. THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE
so two ways to speak is..
production is expected to double..
OR it is expected that the production will double
求求老师不要再胡说八道了。
你写的这个他之前也讲过,可能这里懒得延展了吧,“胡说八道”就有点过分了吧
谢谢大佬撑腰,确实是怪我懒了,现在把选项B的解析更新的更详细了些~
毕老师写过 “不定式和从句” 的区别~我就是通过这个排除的B 层主可以康康~
这道题通过不定式和从句的区别来区分
平方差公式套一下
商怎么就是复数了
The shang 不只可以理解为商朝,还可以理解为商朝人,第一句里说了administrators,说明主语是一些人(并且是复数),所以后面的the shang只能理解为商朝人
In English, collective nouns for ethnic groups / families/dynasties / proper names for sports teams, etc, will be plural (unlike other collective nouns):
The Welsh have delightful accents.
The Medici were avid art collectors.
The Heat (basketball team) play in Miami.
So in this sentence, "the Shang" must be plural. Eliminate C.
In E, "and" should connect two verbs. However, "and well known" is a participial modifier. This isn't parallel.
The correct answer is D.
In English, collective nouns for ethnic groups / families/dynasties / proper names for sports teams, etc, will be plural (unlike other collective nouns):
The Welsh have delightful accents.
The Medici were avid art collectors.
The Heat (basketball team) play in Miami.
So in this sentence, "the Shang" must be plural. Eliminate C.
In E, "and" should connect two verbs. However, "and well known" is a participial modifier. This isn't parallel.
The correct answer is D.
单论代词指代问题,B,D是不是有同样的问题呢,B中it 指代的是 code,也就是说是CODE引起争端, D中this 也指代是海商法吧,毕竟句子里面单数就是code了 ,那D为啥错呢
D 中 not buy .....A and B as well, 有否定词还用as well 是对的嘛?就是因为这个排除D的
①当前:FD-high fee&low cost ——SD-low fee&high cost。题目给出了一种操作:把SD换成FD,额外费用可忽略不计(Assume that installation costs for FD are insignificant if the customer already has SD service),换成FD后只需继续支付low fee,但是对于公司而言,有人换成fd之后还是交得low fee,但同时公司的成本也降低了,所以问题简化成:成本降低,收入降低,问你利润怎么变。那就看哪个降低得更多。
②现在accountants认为这换成FD之后利润会降低,分析:利润降低那就是收入降低>成本降低,所以题目让我们选出符合这种情况的。A选项(这种情况讲的是换之后相对于没换之前的变化,也就是extra,这两个extra之所以是“额外的”就是因为换了之后他们俩都没了,就是前面说的都降低了)那么A选项就可以理解成:消失的收入>消失的成本,也就是收入降低>成本降低,所以选A.
两种方法:
1. 老实分类,花的时间多
2.将题干和条件,相互加减,花时间少
啊所以这个assemblers是工厂流水线上的工人吧。我一直以为是帮客户把买回家的电视装好的售后之类的......
哈哈哈哈我也是这样以为
我也是,看了五分钟,完全不明白
我也是,
我也是
其中一个考点应该是 like 与 as的用法,选项A不能将 ANT 与 structure相比较
太棒了!
6 countries, 75 people. No 2 countries sent the same number of people.
Stmnt 1: One country sent 41 people.
The other 5 together sent 75 - 41 = 34 people. 'A' sent the most number of people from the remaining 5 countries. Does A need to send at least 10?
34 divided by 5 is approximately 7. On average, every country sent 7 people so we can split it into 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 (try and split around 7 so that the average stays approx 7). A sent 9 people here.
A could have sent more than 10 people of course (say if the other 4 countries sent 1, 2, 3 and 4)
Not sufficient.
Stmnt 2: A sent fewer than 12
A could have sent 9 people (example above) or 11 (Split is 2, 6, 7, 8, 11. Try to make minimum changes to get what you want to minimize the chances of error. Since I want to increase the last number, I just reduce the first one appropriately).
Again, not sufficient.
Using both statements together, A could have sent 9 or 11 people so not sufficient.
Answer (E)
mark
错选B,我的理解:选项中提到F可以在remains of a small meteorite中找到,但题目讲的是在crust的the rare mineral shungite的F,不是一个东西?我脑补以为是说题目里的F可能由collision得到,所以不一定是需要那些温度和压力的,想多了。。。但是我感觉D也有点过度推理啊,为什么unknown就是和lab的不一样了,所以默认lab里都弄出来这个东西了,structure就是known的吗?
选项有几个词some,remains of a small meteorite,如果假设只有微量的fullerenes ,比如几毫克是在meteorite上,对推测根本不会造成影响,依然可以通过实验室推断地球的情况。
芝麻开门
曼哈顿解释了一种跳跃修饰的情况,就是当主语修饰语很长而谓语修饰语或宾语较短时,为了避免将这部分放在后面产生的歧义,先把该说的说完,然后再接修饰语。我觉得这个情况跟那种情况类似,for private conversation较短,而that从句较长,但其实that是跳跃修饰tool。
是that 可以跳跃修饰,然后which不可以嘛?我当时因为这个原因把CD都排除了
果因推理:
先出现结果-sea otter数量下降
解释原因- orcas were the cause
切入点:CQ1-其他因素 CQ2-因果联系 ; 选项要么给出sea otter下降的其他原因,要么提及sea otter&orca之间的关系
错选了E 但是逻辑中的两个主体应该是orcas和sea otter,而seal不是
被提问句中的orcas will eat otters when seals are unavailable 迷惑了