It is used in making a "more than" type of comparison where you also want to refer to a previously stated verb / action (that's where the "so" comes in). In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."

枚举推理：几篇论文认为P是作者----> P就是作者 CQ1样本代表性
C. 没提及样本 there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500s
枚举/统计推理一定要提及样本

Drawback: 得不到外部企业的尊重（反话正说：有了头衔就多了尊重。）
用title的好处=不用title的坏处
use of a title can facilitate an executive's dealings with external businesses. 使用头衔可以促进与外部的商业交易——>使用头衔的好处
strategy: 就是不使用头衔

1. the rising sea level 的核心词是sea level, 不是rising, rising只是一个modifier
2.possible consequences (可能的后果)——>include(包含)... ✅ possible consequences (可能的后果)——> may include(可能包含) ❌
有possible表可能的意思时, 谓语动词前就不用使用may再表达“可能”了

Option B:
Impairment of linguistic capabilities does not occur in people who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain.
Negated B:
Impairment of linguistic capabilities does occur in people who have not suffered any damage to any language center of the brain.
This does not affect our argument because it says that people who have NOT suffered any damage to any language center of brain are liable to getting their linguistic capabilities impaired. However, the question doesn't differentiate between people who have suffered any damage to language center and people who haven't. Additionally, this does not come close to explaining that people who have suffered a serious stroke on the left side of the brain without suffering such impairment must have their language centers in the right half!

C中they的指代应该是没问题的，首先how和when两个从句明显是平行结构，其次they did很明显的主谓关系，其中they是主语，往前找是很明确的指代mammals然后did替代colonized。个人感觉指代问题不能只看对应名词，还得看结构关系，C的结构关系很明了，并不会造成ambiguity，不算fatal error

看了800遍原来是sale和rent在竞争∠( ᐛ 」∠)＿

没懂，Tiger sharks prey feed on small sharks, 如果猎杀Tiger sharks，不是对small sharks的数量增长是有帮助的吗？为什么会call into question 呢?

题目出错了。
选项E漏字了，E 选项 实际上是E. reserves, raising fears that other countries would
但是这里的选项是 reserves, raising fears that other countries 少了would。
缺了would，动词时间关系就绝壁错了。E就变成了fears that other countries do the same and inundate the market. 都没发生的事情 还能用现在时？
校对 还需加强。

只有there be句型，没有there have或者there do的句型

只有both...and...等寥寥的“平行触发语”。类似于but，and，or，while等等连词并不需要所谓的严格平行
rate不能用half

and判断出三个名词并列关系

已经代表了总体中最麻烦最极端的一种，连它都没问题了，任何其他的也就没问题了

分母只含有2，5的分数可以化成有限小数

integer between 1 and k 包含1 和k

X和Y的产能差2天，而XY3天一共完成了超过1W的，那么Y单独生产肯定在6天以内，因为Y的产能比X大，2个Y肯定比1个X和1个Y要快。假设Y是5天，那么X是7天，没有这个答案，Y 是4天，X是6天，选E。代入也符合。

说是Assumption，是因为用的是would surely吗？

确实很压力

我要被这个解释笑死哈哈哈哈哈
The biggest problem in Choice E is that the core of the sentence is "birds ... were prompting". According to that sentence, the birds themselves were "prompting" political action, during the timeframe of the sentence. I.e., while they were falling out of the sky, cold and dead, they whipped out their telephones and called California politicians.

A,B, C选项里的for participating结构在语义上是个错误，原句的意思想表达“他们是外省的人，所以市政厅投票否决了他们去参加游行的许可”， They were denied permission for participating in parade, 意思是"他们的许可被否决，因为他们参加了游行“，这是语义上的错误，正确的语义是”他们参加游行的许可被否决了“，而不是”他们因为参加了游行而被否决了许可“。

D选项是They voted the denial of permission, vote通常在表达投票支持或者反对什么东西的时候，习惯用法是后面借助一个介词/不定式再加宾语，或者加宾语再加介宾，比如，请投票支持/反对某法案：please vote for/against the Bill; 请投票支持这个行动： Please vote to support the action；请把约翰选进委员会：please vote john onto the committee.

E正确，投票否决了他们去参加游行的许可， they voted to deny them permission to participate in the parade. Deny sb sth, 否决了某人某事。