take it orders from理解反了....其实take it orders from不理解也可以做题，and 平行看前一句话的意思就好了，It is true that the British Imperial Bank in Iran was never entirely a tool of the British government说明英国政府起不了控制作用，A肯定是错的啦。错选A

B 这里省略掉的是do，因为比较对象【wild animals have】应对应xxx have，所以至少C的对比也是有问题的。
其次，这里省略了 do不会产生歧义，是因为野生动物肯定不会含有牲畜，所以比较的对象就是wild animals 有的脂肪量和 livestock 含有的脂肪量

🐎：
文中只有一处出现了1997年之前24年间GDP在增长这句话，“One point these journalists overlooked is that in 1997, as in the twenty-four years immediately preceding it, the real GDP per capita grew nearly one-half percent a year more slowly than it had on average between 1873 and 1973. ”就说了24年间的比1873-1973年间的more slowly，slowly的原因没有介绍，后面说的都是1997年与1873-1973年的对比了，没有再提过这24年。
在1997年，正如之前的24年一样，实际的人均GDP增长速度比起在1873-1973年之间的增长速度放缓了0.5%。-> 只给出了增长放缓的事实，没有阐述背后的原因

Q大圆，P,R小圆。P在Q里面，R和Q有交集。

用title的好处=不用title的坏处？？外国人都是这么直线思维吗...

D选项were studied时态错误，如果是过去被研究的，现在应该已经有结果了
E选项的were studied是虚拟语气，正确。

！！！未划线句子没看完，有一个them
B选项them指代没有歧义而且shaped的对象也没有歧义

A。prevention of 不如preventing xxx 合理
B。being 多余
C。合理表达句意
D：destroying an elderly patient变成了修饰的内容，原句的意思是防止illness destroy 老人，这里只是防止illness，这个illness会destroy老人。
E：同理改变句意。

A：its指代有问题， its 可以指代所有格 所以可能会指代Masters Dog Training Club’s
B：their无指代
D：ruled修饰错误，was teaching错误
E：，rejecting修饰主句错误，根据事情发生前后，应该是rejecting在前。
ps,根据ruled后面接的内容也可以做出split，加that从句意思表达清晰合理。

Choice A is correct because the sentence must begin with a verb form that completes the construction To… is to feel. Each of the other choices breaks the parallelism in some way,
B and C substitute about for of, the preferred preposition here.
E begins with To, but have read creates a disjunction of tenses by placing the action of reading in the past while to feel is still in the present. The question is of middle difficulty

neither nor固定搭配，排除AD.
AC选项preoccupied with 和curious about结构不完整，不平行
E选项it无指代

ACD such like，错误
B：平行角度来说air pollution can threathen...,but also (can) impatr,两个并列的句子应该都是用表示可能的句意。
as well应该放句尾，错误

D uses "unforseeable" which is an unidiomatic construction. To be concise more elaborate, I present these two sentences.

1. The fog is unable to be seen by the people ir The fog is incapable of being seen by people
2. The fog cannot be seen by people

ACE:they 无指代，过去完成时错误，排除
BD选项的区别在于D选项的not foreseeable讲得是一种特征，改变句意。

请问大家in its effects这个短语的位置应该怎么确定，谢谢

A:effect was like eruption句意错误
B:同A
C:it指代不了所有格形式的earthquake，而且也不平行
D:结构对称，句意清晰
E:effect was like eruption句意错误

考察；distinguish a from b✅
distinguish a and b ❌
近义词辨析不会是考点，much less，far less更倾向于做副词，两者在这里都可以用

1.key takeaway
X is 200 times as old as Y -- CORRECT.
X is 200 years as old as Y -- WRONG.
X is 200 years older than Y--CORRECT
2.supposed修饰predecessors，表示推测可能是predecessors，
supposedly是副词不修饰predecessors，而是修饰Mediterranean，地中海地区的。

A.which指代错误
B.主谓一致错误
C.是programmes在thriving,不是发展电视节目在thrivIng
D.they指代有歧义
E正确。句间逻辑合理，某个电视节目曾经被禁止，现在在繁荣发展。