选项中只要能建立aflatoxin和热带人之间的联系就可以了
从句意出发,
thromboxane,是一种物质that可以阻止血凝块,
thromboxane,是一种可以阻止血凝块的物质
第二种更加符合逻辑
spars adj.稀少的
醉了
倒装,原句等同于Halley's comet cause such a worldwide sensation In no other historical sighting as in its return in 1910–1911
a worldwide sensation In no other historical sighting和 a worldwide sensation in its return in 1910–1911对比平行,可以省略 a worldwide sensation
1. not so much... as ... (not 和so much是连着的) 是 与其说...毋宁说...的意思
e.g. The ocean do not so much divide the world as unite it. 与其说海洋是把世界分隔开了还不如说是把世界连接起来了
2. (否定句) so much as ... 这个否定句可以是含有not ,no 或者without之类,大多数时候与后面的so much as 分开。 但跟上面的idiom的不同之处就在于so much 和 as 是连着的
>意思可以是but rather:
e.g. I'm not looking at her so much as I am studying her hat. 我没在看她,只不过是在看她的帽子
>也可以是even:
e.g. From outside, no one could see so much as a light on in the house. 从外面只能看到房子里的灯而已
错选E
因为在原文中没找到现代的观点,其实This central role of the Black Death (traditionally attributed to bubonic plague brought from Asia) has been recently challenged from another direction.和这句话就是现在的观点
rc
看清楚题干关键词“ for health”,漏掉了??
A选项:有低效的解毒过程:文章认为,当动物先天不足时,会用C后天弥补;当基因强大时,C就用于展示自己。不管C用于何处(过程),解毒过程都是有效的(结果)。
没有读懂文章最后的意思,没理解。。
Were it not = if it were not
倒装+虚拟语气
1.提炼P&C
(因)P:自动贩卖机不符合我们学生的利益(如喝软饮导致不健康)
(果)C: 不应该允许自动贩卖机
2.判断推理方式:因果推理
3.评估预判:
CQ1:干扰因素问题:
CQ2:因果联系问题:
4.将选项和CQ进行匹配
CQ2:A选项
1.提炼P&C
目的:increase the number of fossils available for research
方案: all fossils that are found in Mernia to be sold only to universities or museums.
2.判断推理方式:方案推理
3.评估预判:
CQ1:方案可行性问题:只允许卖化石给学校能否达到目标?
CQ2:方案可操作性问题:方案现实吗?可操作吗?
CQ3:方案副作用问题:方案实施后有什么副作用吗?
4.将选项和CQ进行匹配
CQ4:E选项
B选项干扰性很强,但是B选项没有讨论方案,排除。
1.提炼P&C
目的:increase the number of fossils available for research
方案: all fossils that are found in Mernia to be sold only to universities or museums.
2.判断推理方式:方案推理
3.评估预判:
CQ1:方案可行性问题:只允许卖化石给学校能否达到目标?
CQ2:方案可操作性问题:方案现实吗?可操作吗?
CQ3:方案副作用问题:方案实施后有什么副作用吗?
4.将选项和CQ进行匹配
CQ1:E选项
B选项干扰性很强,但是B选项没有讨论方案,排除。
本题就是非常经典的doing,svo,问作用的类型。这里的作用,其实就是看doing咯。
Ron:GMAC's "draw conclusion" questions will ALWAYS require you to combine two or more statements from the passage.
1.提炼P&C
P(因):All production work on The Big Heist was actually completed months before Thieves was released.
C(果): The accusation is clearly without merit.
2.判断推理方式:因果推理
3.评估预判:
CQ1:干扰因素问题问题:
CQ2:因果联系问题:
4.将选项和CQ进行匹配
CQ1:B选项
"until healing" would apply to the subject "swelling and stiffness". those don't heal; the injured area does. therefore, you need a construction that changes the subject to "the injured area" -- or a pronoun that stands for those words, as in the actual correct answer.
be liable to do 有做某事的倾向,后面通常是不好的事情,liable通常是指法律上或者义务上的那种倾向;
be likely to do 很可能做某事,用法更general一些
能问下e为什么不对吗
E选项中its无指代
借这问题在说一下非限制性定语从句和限制性定语从句
假设E选项变为:conflicts, which in the past might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company, executives are likely to
同样选A,不是因为E错,而是因为A更好。which引导的非限定从是对先行词的附加说明,去掉不会影响主句的意思,但是这里明显不能去掉,正是因为conflicts that might have led to dissolution of the business, plague a small company,才能使得后面的主句更有说服力,即executives are likely to turn to outside professional counsellors to help resolve disagreement
感谢回复!!! 你太厉害了
客气哈~我是菜逼,大佬太多了
rc
这道题快速选的方法:肯定得和tenured有关,因为B是来研究tenure的,他的观点和此有关;organizational tenure
那么和tenure无关的应该都不对
A 后面两个that是谁引导的宾从?无从得知,反正不是recount,recount that? 说不通
B 错误同A
C 错误同A
D recounted和said没有连词连接,错误
如果D中的said表示伴随是否合理呢
不合理。表伴随至少应该用saying吧,不然said就是过去·分词表被动,更不对
有道理!明白啦~谢谢🙏
姐妹太客气了
2.判断推理方式:类比推理
----Swedish----- -----Israeli-----
equally well-funded and comprehensive systems for providing formal assistance
结论:Swedish sample received 一样多的 formal assistance
推理结论: Israeli received 一样多的 formal assistance
3.评估预判:
CQ1:相似性问题:S和I是否真的存在相似性?有没有不相似的特点?
CQ2:反案例问题:存在一个案例与S和C平行
4.CQ和选项进行匹配
E选项:CQ1,说明了S和I一个不同的特点
这些模考是适用于2019年的还是2020年的,为什么有一种划两句话问你在段落中分别充当什么角色,比如总结或者证据的题型,我在OG上没见过呀
真题上会出现啊,概率比较小吧
我见过呀,OG上有
2020OG很多boldface的