y=kx+b,已知k=-1/10,不知道b就知道到底相交还是不相交。要求b,需要另一个方程式,题目只给了y=0时,x>1,算不出b。
求一下x=1时直线与圆的相交情况,因为斜率已经固定,把求出来的直线向x>1的方向平移就能看出x>1后,直线与圆的相交情况。
这题是要削弱k的论证,方法之一就是他因论证, 有意思的是他因h这个人已经给了。 所以答案是 k没有考虑到h给的这个他因。
平行的主从句才要求平行
Dthe rate of mainstream American businesses failing
应该用fail的从句来表示 failling 在这里是主要的 核心意思
rc
简单题
定位题干关键词“nuclear polyhedrosis viruses can remain virulent ”-》“ if protected from direct sunlight, they may remain virulent”
as换成by的话 a选项是对的吗?
rc
定位,一句话解题:
but population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it.
rc
b引入他因;
且他因是前面premise的否定,这在rc中的逻辑分析是可以且常见的。直接否定了“opulation ecologists' attempts to alter cycles by changing the caterpillars' habitat but failed”
说了“New experiments in which the habitats of lepidoptera are altered( in previously untried ways) result in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles.”
/D/ 加粗内容不是evidence,而是解释
rc
定位关键词“ mortality,measure”题干
The common approach of studying causes of population cycles by measuring the mortality caused by different agents, such as predatory birds or parasites,
only Pierre (1852), because of its subject and its characters, is close to being a novel in the Jamesian sense.
ONLY这个词说明James的评判标准太过度了,以此来打击james的观点。
rc
主旨题,
一个现象,提出假设“选项:present a hypothesis about the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera”
第一段总结句In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
第二段“may be”---Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus。
最后一段One of the attractions of this hypothesis is its broad applicability.
embryogenesis 胚胎发生,指向第二段
晕_(¦3」∠)_,选了E
读反了,啊呀
rc
a.give an example of how the nature of amber has been misunderstood in the past举出一个琥珀在之前如何被误解的例子:P的看法是正确的,没有误解琥珀。
b.point out an exception to a generalization about the history of people's understanding of amber指出一个 在人们对琥珀的理解中的例外:P与世人认为的不一样,所以是一个例外
不要看到give an example就去选,都有很多陷阱,问的是poliny一个提出正确观点的人;所以看选项一定要看全,尤其是后半句,不要只根据前面的几个词定性
定语不是主干成分/核心词问题。
C选项:that will run...是trucks的定语从句,那么主干成分为“UPS转变卡车”,但逻辑上来说,应该是转变汽油卡车变成天然气卡车(双宾为主干成分,而定语不是)。
用伴随或是用从句看是有由主语引起还是宾语。
reducing their numbers是伴随状语,其逻辑主语应该为其所修饰的句子的主语,即,our ancestors suffered an event的主语。但在逻辑上,下降祖先数量的应该是事件,而不是祖先本身。
破折号是一个很神奇的符号,身后的内容既可以修饰一个词,也可以修饰一个句子。在本题中,破折号身后加上用that引导的从句(修饰词)或者省略这个that(修饰句子)都是可以接受的。
C选项:so that their numbers were greatly reduced是结果状语从句,但其是被动语态,语义上约等于:某人或某物下降了我们祖先的数量。
我们的祖先遭受到了一个事件,如此以至于,某人或某物下降了我们祖先的数量。
划线的两句话之间没有了因果关系。(肯定应该是,遭受事件,如此以至于,这件事下降了数量)
质数里除了2和5可以被任意数除成有限小数外,其余质数如3,7,11,13,17,19,23等除非被自己的倍数除,否则都是除不尽。因为10进制构数法的原因,它们不能被10均分。
我有一个疑问,A选项这里比较对象many species of dinosaur 和a warm-blooded mammal’s (metabolism), a cold-blooded reptile’s(metabolism)为什么是一致的呀
我觉得 这里平行的对象应该是metabolism 和a warm-blooded mammal’s (metabolism), a cold-blooded reptile’s(metabolism)