Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves short-term. Companies' hopes that promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify. A price promotion entices only a brand's long-term or "loyal" customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced. They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of their customary brands is temporarily available at a reduced price. A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have lingering aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to a brand's reputation or erosion of customer loyalty, as is often feared.
So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to management, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line.
The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions' "effect on the bottom line" (see highlighted text) is provided by
the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
the frequency with which price promotions occur
price promotions' inability to attract new customers
price promotions' recognizable effect on sales
the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 D:Price promotions recognizable effect on sales。
这是因为文章中指出,价格促销对销售量的影响是比较明显的,尽管价格促销本身并不会在长期内产生积极的效果,但它仍然吸引了许多短期客户。由此可以看出,价格促销是有明显影响的,因此D选项是正确选项。
定位句:
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
开展价格促销活动是有成本的,否则公司会开展更多价格促销活动。
题目问的是:价格促销活动,对“bottom line 的影响” 的依据是什么。
bottom line 就是盈亏平衡的底线,原文说了开展价格促销活动会增加成本,从而对bottom line影响;如果没有成本,那公司就会开展更多的价格促销活动,
所以价格促销活动的数量和频率 - loss 的变化 - bottom line的影响
thanks, very clear! 原来我一直不理解bottom line的含义
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
思路:促销不挣钱---如果挣钱他们就更愿意提供更多促销了---不挣钱但还是要搞是为啥----怎样证明确实不挣钱----因为挣钱了他们就更愿意搞了 gg
逻辑不清楚啊你这个。。。
促销发生次数之少有力的证明了该政策对公司带来的负面经济作用,原文中的more也与frequency对应。这样最后一句的话意思就是:虽然促销对于公司经济效益有负面作用,但是决策者依然不愿意放弃这个手段。
赞,谢谢指导
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them
价格促销是亏本的,否则会有更多的促销;题目问对于BOTTOM LINE 的影响的证据,即影响了促销的频率,没有成本的话会有更多
bottom line 盈亏平衡线,即net earning
经验:不要凭借自己的理解,要回到原文找硬的证据!
这个经验不错~
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
定位句:
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
开展价格促销活动是有成本的,否则公司会开展更多价格促销活动。
题目问的是:价格促销活动,对“bottom line 的影响” 的依据是什么。
bottom line 就是盈亏平衡的底线,原文说了开展价格促销活动会增加成本,从而对bottom line影响;如果没有成本,那公司就会开展更多的价格促销活动,
所以价格促销活动的数量和频率 - loss 的变化 - bottom line的影响
这题真是绝了……
问题问: 文章是如何说明 “价格促销的影响是微乎其微的呢?” effect on bottom line 微乎其微的影响 最底线的影响。
因为很少人用 可以说明它的影响微乎其微。
以什么样的方式给证据的……
显然促销是在亏损情况下进行的,如果不亏损会有更多这样的促销。文中给effect on bottle line提供证据的是?注意体会despite说明是消极的,可以理解为尽管没有挣到钱,但是仍然不放弃,为啥?咋证明没有挣到钱??很显然因为能挣钱的话就有更多的促销活动了。
这题真心刺激,考场环境下需要脑袋转的飞快的八
这题也太鸡贼了
①bottom line Refers to a company's net earnings, net income or earnings per share (EPS).
②题目问的是 文章从哪里体现出 price promotion对于公司net earings的影响了
③定位:最后一段: Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
以下哪个证据支持price promotion是有negative effect on the bottom line
从文中的 ”clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them." 可以得知B是正确选项。因为如果price promotion没有负面影响的话,那么商家都会选择多进行price promotion。所以B: price promotion出现的频率体现了price promotion的negative effect on the bottom line。
the bottom line盈亏平衡线
根据意思可以推导出effect on the bottom line是指负面的
问题的意思是哪个是这种负面影响的证据
没太看懂解释,但是可以用排除。AC要么都选要么都不选,E是正面的
bottom line 净利润,对净利润的影响,找那个能够为影响净利润提供evidence。B
“effect on the bottom line” bottom line, 盈亏底线本身是一个不是很正面的词的词,也就是找题目中,表示price promotion effect不是很正面的证据,也就是证明为什么price promotion的effect不是那么positive
题目是 【evidence for】 对收益的影响is provided by?
effect on the bottom line 作者已经表明了是bad effect了,那证明它是bad的evidence是什么呢?
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be 【more of them】. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss.
C选项是第一段的,如果选C,那这第二段要来干嘛,且attract new customer与profit的关系作者并没有专门阐释
bottom line不是指损益表的最后一行,就是净收益么。。
我一直纠结为什么不选a,我把lingering理解为留存收益。但是b的frequency我一直在原文中没有找到。难道说是promotion的频率越高,所以increase sales越多,然后损失越多??
bottom line是盈亏底线的意思
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.说明了price promotion对于bottom line的影响。当答案与想的不一致时最好回原文附近(或本段开头结尾)看一看