Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves short-term. Companies' hopes that promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify. A price promotion entices only a brand's long-term or "loyal" customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced. They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of their customary brands is temporarily available at a reduced price. A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have lingering aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to a brand's reputation or erosion of customer loyalty, as is often feared.
So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to management, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line.
The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions' "effect on the bottom line" (see highlighted text) is provided by
the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
the frequency with which price promotions occur
price promotions' inability to attract new customers
price promotions' recognizable effect on sales
the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 D:Price promotions recognizable effect on sales。
这是因为文章中指出,价格促销对销售量的影响是比较明显的,尽管价格促销本身并不会在长期内产生积极的效果,但它仍然吸引了许多短期客户。由此可以看出,价格促销是有明显影响的,因此D选项是正确选项。
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
开展价格促销活动是有成本的,否则公司会开展更多价格促销活动。
题目问的是:价格促销活动,对“bottom line 的影响” 的依据是什么。
bottom line 就是盈亏平衡的底线,原文说了开展价格促销活动会增加成本,从而对bottom line影响;如果没有成本,那公司就会开展更多的价格促销活动,
所以价格促销活动的数量和频率 - loss 的变化 - bottom line的影响
thanks, very clear! 原来我一直不理解bottom line的含义登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
逻辑不清楚啊你这个。。。
促销发生次数之少有力的证明了该政策对公司带来的负面经济作用,原文中的more也与frequency对应。这样最后一句的话意思就是:虽然促销对于公司经济效益有负面作用,但是决策者依然不愿意放弃这个手段。
赞,谢谢指导登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
价格促销是亏本的,否则会有更多的促销;题目问对于BOTTOM LINE 的影响的证据,即影响了促销的频率,没有成本的话会有更多
bottom line 盈亏平衡线,即net earning
这个经验不错~登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
开展价格促销活动是有成本的,否则公司会开展更多价格促销活动。
题目问的是:价格促销活动,对“bottom line 的影响” 的依据是什么。
bottom line 就是盈亏平衡的底线,原文说了开展价格促销活动会增加成本,从而对bottom line影响;如果没有成本,那公司就会开展更多的价格促销活动,
所以价格促销活动的数量和频率 - loss 的变化 - bottom line的影响
这题真是绝了……
因为很少人用 可以说明它的影响微乎其微。
这题真心刺激,考场环境下需要脑袋转的飞快的八
①bottom line Refers to a company's net earnings, net income or earnings per share (EPS).
②题目问的是 文章从哪里体现出 price promotion对于公司net earings的影响了
③定位:最后一段: Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them.
从文中的 ”clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them." 可以得知B是正确选项。因为如果price promotion没有负面影响的话,那么商家都会选择多进行price promotion。所以B: price promotion出现的频率体现了price promotion的negative effect on the bottom line。
根据意思可以推导出effect on the bottom line是指负面的
问题的意思是哪个是这种负面影响的证据
effect on the bottom line 作者已经表明了是bad effect了,那证明它是bad的evidence是什么呢?
Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be 【more of them】. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss.
C选项是第一段的,如果选C,那这第二段要来干嘛,且attract new customer与profit的关系作者并没有专门阐释