While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
题目分析:
本题较长,结构和从句都较多,需要大家耐心把句子看懂。
选项分析:
A选项:本选项中第一个it是一个形式主语,指代身后的不定式短语to run nuclear plants,还原为正常语序则有:
to run nuclear plants costs about the same as other types of power plants.
在逻辑上,costs about the same as other types of power plants的主语不能是不定式短语,而应该是名词短语,即,
Running nuclear plants costs about the same as other types of power plants
其考查了“不定式和ing的区别”。用之于本题,显然是在讨论运营核电站这件客观事实需要花费多少,而不是主观的某个人或团体运营核电站的情况,因此应该用ing短语。
另外,定语从句that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity的身前都是复数名词,所以其没有合理的修饰对象。
最后请注意一个没有错误的地方。状语从句the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants中的比较对象是没有任何问题的。这是一个省略现象,补全则有:
the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as the cost for other types of power plants.
这里的for基本上代替了of running,不直接用of是因为running也省略了。如果直接是of的话,会被认为是其它核电站的成本,而非运营成本。
B选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项:to run nuclear plants 错误同(A);makes错误同(A)。
D选项:to run nuclear plants 错误同(A);另外,本选项中stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants是the electricity they generate is more expensive的伴随状语(根据状语的就近修饰原则),所以stem的逻辑主语是the electricity,这是不正确的。在逻辑上,源自于建造核电站的固定成本的(stem from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants )应该是“电能更贵”这件事,而不是电能(the electricity)本身。
E选项:比较对象不对等。在逻辑上具有same关系的应该是“运营核电站的成本”和“运营其它类型电站的成本”,因此应该用The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as that of other types of power plants。
MARK D
没注意到 to run he running 这个考点
the same...(名词)...as
这题没有看到外延与内涵的考点,如果能识别的话,做起来会轻松很多。当变化部分发生在主语时,不定式表示的是个人行为,ing表示的是群体行为,这里显然是客观事实,所以应该用名词短语; 另外,本题中的比较部分也很特殊,for代替了of doing,mark一下,如果只用of的话会改变比较前后的对象。伴随状语的逻辑主语是其所修饰句子的主语,这一点在做题时忘记了。
毕出老师,AC选项中的that引导的不是定语从句把,应该是跟前面的it is...that构成一个强调句型,然后强调句的特性就是it is...that去掉原句依然成立,去掉以后变成了the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants makes it more expensive...犯了主谓不一致的错误,请毕老师看一下。
问题1:如果it同时做代词和it is...that强调句型,这样的用法应该不算错把?就如你在下面解析中说的it作形式主语时并没有指代代词,所以不存在指代歧义?
问题2:请问一下毕出老师,比较结构中补出省略成分时有什么限制吗,是只要前半句有的成分都能补出,还是只能按照成分来补出,比如B选项中可以补出the cost,E选项the same as后面的结构里能不能补出the cost of,这是个困扰了我很久的点,我现在自己的理解就是要补就要按完整的成分补,B选项中the cost是前面的主语,后E选项中of不是一个完整的成分;还是说E选项的错误在于the cost of是能补的,只不过补出以后的句意也不对,变成了其他核电站的成本,而比较的是运营成本。。希望毕老师有空能解答一下
cost to..
the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as(the cost)for other types of power plants
the same as平行结构
B the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as(the cost)for other types of power plants
E other types of power plants和cost比
A:去掉强调结构“it is……that……”并还原成正常语序后为“the fixed costs makes……”主谓不一致。
“状语从句the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants中的比较对象是没有任何问题的。这是一个省略现象,补全则有:
the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as the cost for other types of power plants.”
A里面的没有任何问题的那个省略句,the cost of running 【for】nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants,为什么前半句没有for呀?
A C D the same.....as 不平行
E比较对象不对等
毕老师,这个a和b我感觉句型都不一样啊,一个是SVO一个是svc,不是只有选项间无成分差异的时候才考虑外延与内涵吗?这种情况不是应该从基本句型的解意入手?虽然我从基本句型入手没解出来吧。
B选项中之后的那个they指的是就近的building nuclear plans么
B选项是不是跟原先句子意思不一样?A的意思是generate electricity这件事很烧钱,B的意思变成Electricity很贵。这样也可以吗??
不存在要跟原句意思一样的点,你只需要看哪个选项符合我们的常识就好了,如果两种语意都可以,都就都不能通过句意排除,你就需要找别的点了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
A句是While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants 没有as for 呀。As for 应该是放在B里吧?
E the same as the cost for other types of power plants; 原句省了for 导致比较对象不对等
as for不是一个固定搭配么…“至于,关于”的意思…
A无理由强调句
老是在下面说对啦的人是不是有毒。。