Quantum theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic "interference" effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.
In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicist Niels Bohr argued that wave-particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.
Physicist Werner Heisenberg's "uncertainty principle," by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.
Which of the following does the passage mention as providing evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects?
Scientists' inability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously
Scientists' inability to measure the momentum of quantum objects with certainty
The similarities in the appearance of particles and waves
The tendency of quantum objects to exhibit well-defined trajectories only at either extremely high or extremely low speeds
The behavior of quantum objects as either particles or waves depending on the type of experiment that is performed
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E。本文提到,实验显示微小物体(如光子和电子)可以表现出粒子和波的双重性质。根据该结论,不同类型的实验将显示出不同的行为。因此,选项 E 正确地提到了该文章包含的内容。
第一段:Quantum theory纵然有很大的科学价值,却激发了物理学家的讨论,原因是Q theory阐述了minute objects 的特性。一些实验证明minute objects具有particle的特性,同时另一些证明minute objects有wave的特性。However转话题,科学家们没能设计出一种实验,证明particle和wave的特性在minute objects上同时存在。
第二段:1920s,有两种理论试图解决这个矛盾的波粒二象性。一个是N B认为particle和wave性质不矛盾,而是互补的。人们普遍认为物质是存在于某个既定的状态,即便人们无法检测它的状态,然而N B认为事实恰恰相反,quantum的性质在人类检测它之前是不确定的。
第三段:WH提出uncertainty principle,与N B相反,WH认为我们无法同时检测到一个物质的两种性质:举了人类不能同时检测position和momentum的例子WH归纳道:尽管我们不能检测,他们的性质还是确定好了的。
Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.
与我们的认知(一个物体以某种确定的形式继续存在)相反,即quantum object的存在形式是不确定的
providing evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects 定位第二段
he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.
其他选项说的都是第三段的内容
undetermined 不确定的
he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.
这篇文章的难点在于专业性,一个问题引出两种方案,异同点比较复杂,短时间内思考起来比较绕。
这篇需要好好分析一下
正确答案不会让你有模棱两可的感觉的 一定要仔细去读每一个选项 且确保自己读懂了题目知道作者想要什么
定位While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic "interference" effects.