Quantum theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic "interference" effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.
In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicist Niels Bohr argued that wave-particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.
Physicist Werner Heisenberg's "uncertainty principle," by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?
The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.
Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.
Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometimes influenced by the expectations of the experimenters.
The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.
Quantum objects possess distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E。Niels Bohr 的结论是量子物体在实验之前是不确定的,他的观点是实验观察之前,量子物体的物理性质是不确定的。因此E选项表明,量子物体有不依赖于测量它们的实验而存在的物理形式,这会对 Bohr 的结论造成最严重的质疑。
Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.
不同于直觉——无论我们是否感知到,这个物质的性质都是确定的——,物质的性质是在被观察到后才确定的。
削弱:同于直觉,无论我们是否感知到,这个物质的性质都是确定的。
undermine的 暗中破坏
原文说量子物质在被实验观察到之前就被破坏;
E选项:量子物质存在的形式不依赖于何种实验,削弱原文。
他说的是被观察决定了物质性质,没被观察,这个东西就可以是波可以是电子。参考薛定谔的猫理论。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
undermine的 暗中破坏
原文说量子物质在被实验观察到之前就被破坏;
E选项:量子物质存在的形式不依赖于何种实验,削弱原文。
找Bohr理论的学弱项,Bohr说:第二段最后一句话 he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment. 说明量子物质其实在实验观察前就已经被破坏。E选项说量子物质与欧持续不变的物理形态,不会因为实验方法而改变,对Bohr理论进行了削弱
求讲解
知乎搜薛定谔的猫。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论