Quantum theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic "interference" effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.

In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicist Niels Bohr argued that wave-particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.

Physicist Werner Heisenberg's "uncertainty principle," by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.


Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?


The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.

Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.

Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometimes influenced by the expectations of the experimenters.

The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.

Quantum objects possess distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them.

考题讲解

此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。


正确答案是 E。Niels Bohr 的结论是量子物体在实验之前是不确定的,他的观点是实验观察之前,量子物体的物理性质是不确定的。因此E选项表明,量子物体有不依赖于测量它们的实验而存在的物理形式,这会对 Bohr 的结论造成最严重的质疑。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

Prep2012-RC