Quantum theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic "interference" effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.
In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicist Niels Bohr argued that wave-particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical of a quantum object is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.
Physicist Werner Heisenberg's "uncertainty principle," by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.
It can be inferred from the passage that if scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously, then the
theory that the dual properties of quantum objects are complementary would be proven
basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted
distinction between particle behavior and wave behavior would cease to exist
debate about quantum theory among physicists would be unchanged
trajectories of quantum objects through space would be more difficult to predict
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 C。
从文章中可以推断,如果科学家能够精确地同时测量量子物体的位置和动量,那么就会消除粒子行为和波动行为之间的区别。这是因为,根据 Niels Bohr 的理论,粒子行为和波动行为是互补的,两者不具有矛盾性,只有当测量量子物体时才能确定它的物理性质。而 Werner Heisenberg 的不确定原理也指出,由于我们的测量能力有限,我们无法同时精确测量这些量子物体的位置和动量。因此,如果科学家能够同时精确测量量子物体的位置和动量,那么粒子行为和波动行为之间的区别将消失。
that if scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously
定位第三段
if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa.
Physicist Werner Heisenberg's "uncertainty principle," by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously
所以如果同时精准得 测量position and momentum of quantum objects,那么uncertainty principle就被推翻了
注意去和uncertainty对应!!!没有仔细看选项!!大忌!!选项有的时候很迷惑人的!!!
"uncertainty principle,"的理论是不能准确的determine 两个complementary properties,而题目说 如果可以准确测量 position and momentum of quantum objects,不是说明它俩就是complementary了(a选项),只能说明现在可以去determine,有途径了,可以去探究它俩是不是complementary ,所以a选项不对,而可以测量 也正好反驳了 "uncertainty principle," ,所以b正确
难道a不对是因为,即使可以确定动能和势能,那么也不代表可以确定量子的wave和particle,因为他们都是量子的complementary property
定位第三段:
Physicist Werner Heisenberg's “uncertainty principle," by contrast, postulated that we cannot
precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantumobject simultaneously,uncertainty principle理论是假设complementary properties不能同时精确的测量到的,现在既然这个条件成立,那就是说这个理论本身不存在。选B