①compared to 有平行的限制 要注意是否可比
②代词的指代问题是一个大问题 要注意去体会含义
③必要修饰的加与不加很容易导致改变intended meaning
④whereas表示对比关系很明显的时候要优于while，while还是主要在强调同时发生/有对比

the remainder of the increase coming from sales of the 9,850 prescription medicines是独立主格结构，做状语。with省略

E.first, false comparison: the earlier part doesn't mention "the energy from nuclear power in france", so this isn't parallel. (the earlier part mentions a percentage of ALL power in france.)
second, and more obviously, the pronoun "it" doesn't have a legitimate antecedent, for essentially the same reason as in (a).

B "compared to germany" isn't a valid comparison, because it's not parallel to anything.
france is tethered to the prepositional phrase "IN france", so it can't be compared to just "germany".
also, the sentence doesn't say that france "uses" anything. germany "uses" the nuclear energy, but it also "uses" the energy that isn't nuclear!

A.the pronoun "it" doesn't have a legitimate antecedent.
here, "it" would have to stand for something like "the percentage/proportion/fraction of energy provided by nukes". there is no such noun in the sentence, so "it" is an orphan.

普通方法：会导致unnecessary operations，意味着没有得病的人被误诊为得病。 test正确诊断的概率为98%。这个test能够减少unnecessary removal，但是不会减少necessary removal。
只有当test 的误诊是把没有得病的病人看成得病，才不会减少necessary removal。
这道题主要的难点不是在于argument的方向，而在于如何找到这个方向以及理解。

做题的时候最重要的还是语义！！一定要很有目的性的找有可能出现歧义的地方（含义）

kmf:Cwhereas nuclear power accounts for just over 33 percent of the energy produced in Germany
Dwhereas just over 33 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany
C中the energy被produced修饰，说明这个energy是来自德国的，
但是D中the energy 就赤裸裸的出现了也没有修饰，所以就默认为这个energy是指代之前提到法国的能源，这样就有歧义。

这道题为什么不选E？如果按照类比推理来看的话，要找Sumpton和other cities的区别，不就是whether public art that the residents of Sumpton would find desirable would probably be found desirable by the residents of other cities

时刻谨记平行规则，是EBB的成功 被overshadowed by 她老公的成功平行 而不是她自己或她的诗歌 因此排除ABC。 E选项比较对象错了。 诗歌对诗歌 而不是对老公

我知道应该选同位语，但B中with interactions affecting global climate作独立主格修饰collects and transmits错在哪里？

not only…but also…确实是一个习惯表达，但是并不是唯一正确的习惯表达。可以用not only…but…，也可以用not only…also…。

我不明白为什么答案要用过去完成时？我错选了A。还有C是不是错在核心词为the use of water would continue，文中应该是the restiction would continue？

D错在哪里呢？为什么只能选A不能选D？

定语从句不是应该紧邻被修饰的词吗？那 that they may not think are true 不是应该修饰紧邻的被修饰词opponent, 怎么就成修饰 statements 啦？

这个类比感觉太难了。
难道不是相关吗
P：withstand tide，很多barnacle
C：withstand tide -> 很多barnacle

A is to B what C is to B 习惯表达方式

E的subsidized是动词被动语态（捂脸

that可以裸奔？
我记得啥啥啥笔记里写的that只能在that of XXX （比较，前面有出现同等词）的情况下，that才能裸奔。除此情况之外，that与this一样，不能裸奔啊。

因为是expected，在当时对未来的一种期望，那么D中的would的用法是否正确？