veritas的语法视频里老师说being表示暂时的状态,不知道老师可以不可以这么理解?
e选项没有缺少一个the吗?melting直接就跟a rise平行了,难道是因为of吗
老师,E选项不是并列的吧?
A:要保证样本数量足够
choice b is badly worded: 'compares to 42 times in 1980' seems to say that, on forty-two different occasions in 1980, the ceo:blue-collar ratio reached 419:1. this is not what we are trying to say.
but you can't just leave "42 times" hanging out alone.
percentages, on the other hand, can be referenced by themselves (as long as context, somewhere else, clearly indicates what the percent is of).
for instance, you can say "80% of the X's are male, up from 67% five years ago". here, the second percentage is understood to be also "of the X's".
you can't just write "42 times" by itself. it has to be 42 times something.
if it's 42 times something that was mentioned previously, or 42 times something that is in parallel structure to something that was mentioned previously, then you could use a relative pronoun (i.e., something like "42 times that in 1990", etc).
使用了代入法,不过此类题目真正的解法是什么?If x is an integer and y = 4x + 3 which of the following CANNOT be a divisor of y ?是一类吗?
3的幂次方个位数为1379循环
3^24=81^6 个位数1六次方还是为1,那么除以5,余数为1。【若问3^23,同理余数为3;若问3^86,3^86=9*81^21,因为81^个位数始终为1,乘以9,个位数始终为9,所以余数为9-5=4】。
3^24=81^6 个位数1六次方还是为1,那么除以5,余数为1。【若问3^23,同理余数为3;若问3^86,3^86=9*81^21,因为81^个位数始终为1,乘以9,个位数始终为9,所以余数为9-5=4】。
one half the number of issues 意思是发行的数量比原来少了一半
needed to found new businesses就近原则修饰 “the contempt of risk and the presumptuous hope of success”,而who have ... 就近修饰 young people。
C为啥不对呢。
选C的话 it is 就要去掉
原文内容着重强调两种Skills的对比,如果选D,那么willing to admit that they lack computer skills or other technical skills就变为可删除的插入语,对比意思就不那么强烈。与D相比,C虽然有名词和动名词的区别,但是语法和语义上都表达的更为完整。所以,选C不是更好吗?
我也觉得herl的解释不充分,主要是disinclination这个词的用法,查了下。
disinclination to do/for sth 基本没有disinclination in..这个用法
可能也有固定搭配的原因。我想到另一个解释:
D选项明确表达了人们愿意承认A, 但是不愿意承认B.
但是如果选C就会产生歧义:B给人们带来了不情愿,但是A没有带来不情愿,语义上不如D
有道理。A非带来非情愿(非为否定词),不如直接说A带来情愿来的明确直接。
B选项,如果把annually的位置调整,比如as much as is emitted annually by...是不是也不对?因为is?
我认为是对的,因为is前面相当于省略了pollutant
不对,缺少比较对象, the amount of pollutant,(that)
感觉这题可以直接用平行做,因为D选项是绝对平行的,所以肯定比其他好
对so的理解错了,因为是代指前面整个行为。。
不懂D为什么错……
D选项假定了per meal的价格一样,但是文章里面并没有提到,所以是无效的。更极端点,你可以这样想,文章中根本没有提到restaurant卖什么,没说卖meal啊,也许只卖饮料酒什么呢。所以D是错的
这不是weaken题,也不是什么must be true. 这种题型是Flaw in The Reasoning Question,跟Method of Reasoning Question是一类,都是寻找文章中存在的逻辑缺陷。这种题目与weaken题的一个很大区别就是,答案不能出现文章以外的信息,否则一定错。这种题遵循以下两个原则:
1. 只能用题干内的内容选择正确答案
2. 所有出现提干以外信息的选型都是错的
感谢感谢!懂了
A为什么错呢。。。
错了 是B,
找flaw啊。。。
交流~restaurant不卖meals这个解释太牵强了,饭店卖meals不能认为是文章以外的信息,否则干嘛用restaurant这个单词。我觉得这样解释好一点,比如换stool前,文章只说less time less expensive,但是具体less多少time会导致less多少money并没有说明,导致影响PROFIT的两个因素time和meal的价格都是变量,依然处于无法确定的情况,可以这样理解——换桌子前人们平均待2小时,用20元,换桌子后人们平均待1小时,用19元,完全符合C选项所述,但PROFIT确实增加了
the problem of choice D is that this does not necessarily weaken the argument. People who stay less time order less expensive food which might cut into the profits. But if you have more people coming in to eat, and you can sit more people during your business hours, then ordering less expensive food won't be a problem. So this might be a problem, but not necessarily.