D changes the meaning by using although. This is saying that despite the fact that they can afford household appliances the labor is demanding, instead of saying whether or not they can afford the appliances the labor is demanding. Although shows that they definitely can, whereas even if shows that hypothetically can.
IMO, the more substantive route to solve this would be to sift whether ' would find' or 'would have found' is correct. There is no point in saying that the grandparents would find them a miracle in the coming future days. We must attribute their perception with what they would have felt in their on their own contemporaneous times.
Even if - means whether or not and has to do with the conditions that may apply.
1. Even if I had time, I wouldn't watch that programme.
2. Even if Mark told the truth, I wouldn't believe him.
Even though - Even though means despite the fact that and is a more emphatic version of though and although. It is primarily concesive
1. Even though I had time, I didn't watch that programme
2. Even though Mark told the truth, I didn't believe him.
The differences can be appreciated in this sentence
1. I'm going out, even if it rains
2. I'm going out, even though it's going to rain
We do not know whether it will rain or not in (1) so we use even if
In (2) we know that it is going to rain but we are going out anyway
为什么B选项中的with不能直接修饰stars?,with 不是就近修饰吗?
非句首情况下,
Comma + with + n. + -ing./ -ed. 才是独立主格
with + n. + -ing/-ed 是 介词短语 + ing/ed 的情况。这种情况大概率是错的。为什么呢?原因是:
- 名词A + 介词短语(比如:with + n. ) ,这个介词短语 限定性修饰 名词A
- 然后,-ing/-ed 限定性修饰 n. (这个n. 是 介词短语里面那个)
所以,会造成句意错误。也就是 老师说的 with planet 来修饰 stars,翻译成:带着恒星的星星。接下来,又来一个,恒星 (主动) 在转them ???这是个什么?
有重力补偿,就没有negative gravity anomalies,
题目说的有最明显的negative gravity anomalies的话,说明就没有重力补偿,所以要找到没有重力补偿是什么情况-->现在没有重力补偿了,但是在early in lunar history是有的
看清是shipping 还是processing!!!审题
根据坐标中点公式直接求出CD中点为(1/2,1/2)
这题想的太复杂了,不必纠结a,b具体取值是否大于1!
(1)k的十位数也可能是4, e.g.140
(2)个位>5,必须进位,所以十位为3
题目关键点在于at least 100,具体数字不确定,(1)not sufficient
(2)有两个方法,加和减都行,1@0也是两个运算都行,这题有毒
这题题意很难理解啊,我还以为是下一层4个橙子=上一层1个橙子。
原来是放在四个橘子中间的意思...
five different integers.
我这题把x^4看成x^2了....
假设y=0,x最大值为根号10>3
只有5人能得分,分数为5,4,3,2,1,每组不超过6分
分别为
5+1
4+2
3
老师我看不懂b项里为什么末尾是独立主格结构。
谢谢老师,我还是学和看都太粗浅,应该精细地学课程。您这么一说,我才会想到这些点课程和网站上都有讲过,自己很难举一反三。
哈哈,这很正常啦~只有不断的重复,才能强化嘛~
REMEMBER positive integers不包括0
所以D选项 the energy后面的from nuclear power in Germany只是一个状语,无法修饰the energy吗?
关键是还有个comes呢呀~A comes from B,come from本身是个及物动词短语,所以自然不能单独把from nuclear power in Germany拆出来做the energy的定语。
想請教一下第9題的(A)
題目是說政府認為取消課可以降低犯罪率,而作者持反對意見,所以就是取消課無法降低犯罪率
而(A)的原意是取消課無法降低犯罪率,所以不取非是support,而取非變成取消課可以降低犯罪率,那變成weaken
雖然這題我是選(C),但(A)的方向也都是正確的吧?
关于A的解释,这里评论里的第一条就是哦~
https://bichu.com.cn/question/Prep2008E2-CR-117
“not so much/as:
as/as即可用于肯定句,也可用于否定句;not so/ as只能用于否定句;
not so much A/as B,与其说是……,不如说是,相当于rather than。可以变形为 not so much A/but B或 not A, so much as B
not so much A/as B可以跟名词/形容词/短语/句子,要求连接对象平行。如:
He isn't so much ill as depressed.=He's depressed rather than ill.
Oceans don't so much divide the world as unite it.
You feel lost, not so much because it threatens you as because it shows humans in such a inhuman light.”
而且在gmat里like不能用于举例
题目说的是possible, 不是must be true
D:假设1990年的中雨的降水量全都是达到极限值2 inches,1910年中雨的降水量全都达到极限值1 inche,那么D的意思就是2*1990年天数>2*1*1910年天数,但是题目说的是1990年的天数是小于1910年的天数的,所以肯定不成立
A:大雨的日子更少,但是大雨的降水量可能是巨多的,因此possible