可以解释一下D选项中that was not successful的主语为什么不正确吗?D选项中不可以attempted later...和that was not successful都做an achievement的定语吗?
attempt做的是谓语啊亲 还有that 是就近指代 that后边是kings的定语从句 首先要是做kings的定语从句这应该是were 因为kings是复数其次 这里不成功的应该是国王们尝试重复成就这件事情 而不是国王们不成功 。。。而且就近指代怎么也不可能成为achievement的定语啊亲 你还是要好好看语法啊!
你好,你的语法没问题。可以理解为两个都作定语。但是an achievement 是做同位语的话,就表示是成功的。第二个定语是说这个achievement没有成功,所以第二个定语的语义错了。
由于本题的问题问的是方案,所以是方案推理。
也可以這樣看呀~嘻嘻
D 选项的 “with a buttressed trunk and with a crown that spreads over the canopy of lesser trees.” 是独立主格么?
不是,独立主格是简化了的状语从句 应该是结构上完整的句子,至少是有谓语,只是该状语的逻辑主语和主句的主语不是一个,这个句子当中应该是with连接的定语
since只能表示现完,bc排除。d中when不对,排除。e中it took后面都没讲清楚,排除
这里是倒装,alphabets were derive from
natural grow不能让they(fish)成为grow的宾语
可是方案推理的话,觉得D选项并没有在谈论这个方案啊,感觉只有A选项有讲到这个方案诶……方案推理的3个CQ不是都要讲到方案才可以吗?(..•˘_˘•..)
所以我们说要关注方案的意思,不要只看词。这个选项讲到了方案和目标的关系呀。
題目問Which of the following, if true, would best support the owner's plan, in light of the manager’s concern?
哪個選項考慮到經理擔憂(顧客不付錢)的情況下,加強店主的方案
D選項有考慮到顧客不付錢(即使他們不付咖啡的錢,還是會花錢買甜點和其他食物),也有加強店主方案(這些買甜點和其他食物的利潤會改善net cash flow)
不知道這樣解釋對不對?麻煩老師看看了!
感觉D从可行性的角度来解释方案。A之所以不可以,是因人数上涨有可能出现manager说的情况,也是就跟目标没有直接关系。D虽然没有直接谈方案确实可行,但是给出了方案可行,实现目标后的一个现象,故也可以说是方案成立。
多谢多谢 我也选了 A 但确实 题目写了要in light of 经理的观点 A 没有考虑到经理说的话 所以选D
给你点赞。找了半天你的评论最精准
果因感覺真的要想一下,想問老師為何不是「因为这个年份很容易被抄写成1460年,所以The testament其实是1409年出版的」
定位第一段最后一句话: Since then, the answer given to the fundamental 【basic】question of who the recipients should be—the most economically disadvantaged or those with the best prospects for business success—has changed, and the social goals of the programs have shifted, resulting in policy changes.
定位第一句话:Colonial historian David Allen's intensive study of five communities in seventeenth-century Massachusetts is a model of meticulous scholarship on the 【detailed】 microcosmic level, and is convincing up to a point【在一定程度上可信】.
X =40到60的全部偶数的和
Y =40到60的全部偶数的数量
X= 40+42+44+46+48+...60 =550 
Y = 11
13.5-2*1.5=10.5
一共15个整数各不相同,中位数是25,那么第8个数就是25,那么最小数的最大取值是25-7=18,最大数=最小数+Range 25=18+25=43
The second "there are..." isn't strictly necessary. Without it, you'd have a sentence with the same structure as "In most countries, there are as many men as women."
Its primary value lies in making the sentence easier to read.
This is not an issue of right and wrong"”it's a style issue"”and so it will never be dispositive in a real problem. Still, you should know it's a thing.
奇怪....为什么我的note发送上来都不是完整的? 小于号,等号都不能显示了:(
n>20+2.5*3 or n27.5 or n选A
n>20+2.5*3 or n27.5 or n
here's a simpler illustration of what is going on here:
suzy weighs far less than tom does.
suzy weighs far less than does tom.
suzy weighs far less than tom.
all of these sentences are correct -- including the last, since there's no ambiguity.
suzy weighs only 120 pounds, far less than tom.
--> this is the same essential construction as the third example above.
However是连接副词。however不能像 but(但是)那样直接连接两个句子(注意正句中的标点符号).如:
我们都已尽了最大的努力,不过我们还是输了..
正:We all tried our best,but we lost the game.
正:We all tried our best; however,we lost the game.
正:We all tried our best.However,we lost the game.
比较的题永远做不对,做对了也是靠别的点做的。感觉是他说可以省略就可以省略,他说意思清晰就意思清晰
+1,心好累,出题的人好任性
YouTube上,或者dustin blog主页上看dustin有一个讲more than用法的视频,能解决大部分对比句问题,我前两天看的,帮助很大,推荐你也看看
真的 。。。弄了半天又不是在考比较,唉。。。。
will你好,请问你说的这个视频,国内的网站有没有呢?谢谢~