完全不知道an proportion of women是复数名词;
另外,同位语的修饰位置是没有就近原则的吗?
同位语里的名词,重复谁,就是修饰谁。所以,只有修饰部分(定、状)才有修饰原则,同位语并不是修饰部分嘛~
无比清楚!
我只想问,这种题考试多不多…>_
1-Between ..and是固定说法, 排除DE, 因为Between...or 错;
2-ABC中 it 和them是区分点,it实际指代a language; 如果这里还拿不准先hold一下;看后面一句,AC分别是but引导的合句, B是with 独立主格;
A,句子结构完整;正确;
C, those指的是语言,主语是 language然后谓语直接find原型,语言只能被发现,应该是被动语态,不能这么玩,C错;
B,with+N+动名词,不能够是动名词呀,明明被动语态,错;
综上,妥妥A;
老师,“现象解释型考题”,判断这类考题的依据是什么?是一些关键词,如explain,justify...?还是什么其他的标识?
如果是一些关键词,那么除了这2个词,还有哪些关键词呢?
C: The author's reasoning is that if the scholars argument were true, then it would be more likely that later judges would not use those precedents as heavily, but they do, therefore the scholars argument is invalid.
E 选项中 amounts of 可以修饰可数名词 nutrients 吗?
C: If early judicial decisions were prejudiced against patentees, one might expect that subsequent courts—allegedly more supportive of patent rights—would reject the former legal precedents. But pre-1830 cases have been cited as frequently as later decisions, and they continue to be cited today
inconclusive意思是无结论的。所以,如果真的untruthful,那么判断正确,但如果不是untruthful,那么就错了,也就是unfairly
gamt接受的常识:价格升高——less attractive
* it will make the electric vehicles even more expensive than they already are (= worse);
WHILE
* ... doing nothing for the existing problem; i.e., the new plan still doesn't make electric vehicles suitable for extended trips (= no change in the problem).
Although这个词是解题关键
发现细节题中的细节涉及到的越细越好
对啦 但是有个问题,这里若改成species, each having its 这样是不是也是错的,因为根据名词定语的限定性,species可以分为有adapting method 和没有adapting method的 ??
我觉得不是哦,因为这里的species已经是在沙漠里的物种了,而这类物种里每个都有各自的本领来适应缺水环境。
另外你在这里好久啊,答疑也看到你,4个月前的提问也有你。。。牛!
我学的是毕老师上一版的语法 就只好自学新的现在这一版的 所以还在
(c) is a generalization that can't be directly applied to vernon in any legitimate way. so, the short answer is that (c) is irrelevant to the argument.
句子必须有连词,没有excepting for
这道题continue to do和doing不是考点么?按照to do 是状态改变、doing状态不变一开始就把ACE排了
全句划线,需要考虑文章中关系,需要考虑句子语法结构
求讲解!
not so much…as…与其说。。不如说。。lay和lie的含义不同
try to do, try doing区别。it指代,需要理解原文
在c跟e之间错选了c
主要是不知道news是单数。
不过c有个定从跳跃修饰的问题,是不是只有非限制性定语从句才能跳跃修饰呢?
另外,e里面的“by swift messenger”前面不应该加一个表被动的was吗?每次看见by就想到被动语态是不是不正确呢?
1. 跳跃修饰和限定性或是非限定性无关。你想,它们都是定语,凭啥有的严格有的不严格呢?很多时候的跳跃修饰是“无奈”之举,当一个名词必须有两个定语,且均需要是后置定语的时候,它们自然只能顺序排在后面。这就造成了跳跃修饰,和考点无关。
2. 是的。by可以引导方式状语啊,只有被动语态身后加by才能是逻辑主语呢,咱不能颠倒因果。
一下就懂了,谢谢老师!