A the present perfect tense of have blocked inappropriately describes an event that caused something to happen before 1920

比较这道题Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last和OG2018－SC－758的A选项Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago为什么这道题对，758错？

通过（1），可以算出剩下打了5场全win，所以一共15；
通过（2），设剩下打了x场，则可以给出（10+x）/(20+x)=0.6，可以算出x=5，所以最后答案为15
所以选D

第一段的next to the use of women’s written autobiography 不是说先考虑written autobiography 再考虑oral narratives吗

A the relative pronoun that refers to satellites, so it should be followed by the plural verb are

E have been illogically indicates Eakins' time continues to the present day

B主要错在文章没有将lone wolf decision和1871 action作比较，所以错了

那如果换成who is a jazz pianist and composer是不是就和同位语是一个意思了？

the usage of with should modify the preceding parts, offering some extra information.

But the usage does not make sense, because the non-underlined part talks about losses, and the with part talks about the usage of profit. ( it shouldn't serve as a modifier to the non-underlined part since there is no logical relationship there)

第二遍还是犯了同样额错误。。。mark
C项中ing状语和-ly副词都修饰的是前面的谓语动词，不存在歧义。
E项根据语义判断不是并列关系，而是从属关系，且不要只看开头就选了，后面先是rapidly又是slower，一个修饰动词一个修饰名词，明显混乱了。

D。这个结果会给baboons的食谱中缺少某些种类昆虫提供一个准确的指示
E。这个结果不大可能提供任何能够证明australopithecine diet是否能被micro-wear studies证明的指示
我们看作者在这一段对micro-wear的态度是 may have limited utility in determining the foods that are actually eaten，limited说明没有全盘否定，而且baboons的例子也说明了，这个studies证明了baboons牙齿没有磨损→baboons不吃昆虫，那么在hard-bodied insects层面上，是对的，也就是证明了absence of some kind of insects 但是在soft-bodied insects是不对的，所以这个some kinds of很好的限定了范围，D就是表达的这个意思，只是说的比较tricky

这个题定位句是：For example, insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
解析：本段开头已经说了micro-wear不能确定动物实际的食物，然后举baboons的例子来支撑，所以答案要找和动物diet有关的，排除只剩下BDE，然后B很明显是个陷阱，添加了文中没有的信息很容易排除，DE之间如何选就要看他们怎么表达

prohibit 为什么弱呢，我觉得禁止了disclose, 肯定控制了这个动作发生啊

从平行的角度来看，除了A都不平行，trade imbalance与US进行对比
从语法点的角度来看，在使用compare to/with时，NO OTHER COMPARISON INDICATOR，排除CDE。B感觉不通

细节题，其实为作者态度题，原文说The GDP assumes that the economic significance of goods and services lies solely in their price，但作者写这篇文章的态度是GDP有缺点，且缺点正是由于一些假设引起的，所以对原文取非

Comparable worth, on the other hand, takes as its premise that certain tasks in dissimilar jobs may require a similar amount of training, effort, and skill; may carry similar responsibility; may be carried on in an environment having a similar impact upon the worker; and may have a similar dollar value to the employer.

eliminate unjustified pay gaps between male and female workers have not remedied perceived pay inequities satisfactorily for the litigants in cases in which men and women hold different jobs

In this sense, then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates, such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

有意思。。其实是两个相关因果的推理链，然后看那个是存在相关性的