请教一个关于主观性和客观性的判断问题，文中介绍 the most extensively used method 是否也可以理解为介绍的是一种客观的情况呢？

老师，这两个评估方向可以详细解释一下吗？个人思考，因果联系问题应该是指质疑事件A和B是否真的有联系，干扰因素是指如果存在一个干扰因素C，即使A发生了，B也可能不发生吗？

but rather和but一样吗

B选项的应该不是缺少连接词吧。。。 一个限制性定语从句中由and连接的并列的动词begins 和ended的时态不一致。。。如果错了请偶像轻拍。。。

此题我根据平行原则先排除了ACE（“smaller” vs “decrease in size），不知这个思路是否有问题？
之后，排除B的理由是“it”只能指代名词“increasing demand”，不能指代“alter the saline content”，而逻辑上“alter the saline content”才是“rob flavor”的直接原因，不知这个思路是否有问题呢？谢谢

D和E都是在说两个时间段的区别，为什么D不对呢？因为冬季气温太低，幼崽容易冻死，所以voles聚在一起生活，感觉可以解释问题啊。是因为D选项里没有提到young prairie voles这个关键词吗？求解答，谢谢老师~

我觉得是因果，因为果因的前提是结果的事实已经发生，但这里并没有发生，机器从来也没有在餐厅放过

B的expect时态也错了

要注意市长的目标是提振经济，而不是提振旅游业。

niubility.....

错了。。看到这是一到简单题，直接【表情】

Can i say "because i was hungry and this restaurant is famous, i stepped into it."?

A The greater number of similarities than differences in style in one population could be attributed
to either cultural acquisition or genetic transmission, so the conclusion is not strengthened.
B Correct. Compared with the other options, this information provides the most additional
support for the researchers’ conclusion.

E Since the goal of switching to LED arrays is to help minimize yearly expenditures on maintenance, a
potential one-time cost—that of training workers to convert the existing fixtures—is not relevant. Further, it is
not necessarily the case that the crews that currently replace the incandescent bulbs would be the ones
converting the existing fixtures—and even if they were, the account of the plan states that conversion costs
would be minimal.

This construction is less successful at clarifying the chain of events because creating seems to refer back to lying; if used as a participial, creating would have to be preceded by a comma. OG里的这个解释看似比较合理，因为这两个时间是有先后顺序的

the brewed leaves 复数

1、cool,provided with high-energy feed, and milked regularly平行
2、them－－》 cows

好像懂了。平行的是cool,provided,milked. 完整句子是keep them cool, keep them provided with.., keep them milked regularly..

D选项用as much as也可能会产生歧义，理解成另外一个意思，即knowledge和content对style的inform程度相同。