A）media是复数（单数是medium），应该用media have；has had as a focus...可以直接用focus避免wordy
b）analyses的谓语动词应该是复数have
d) #Ron#have had as a focus与have overlooked...的平行程度不如
c); have had as a focus...wordy
e) media的谓语应该是have，时态错误

C
* "continues strong" doesn't make sense. "strong" is an adjective; there is no noun here for it to modify.
* "would" is wrong; it should be "will".
("would" has 2 main uses: 1 * it's the past tense of "will". i have no idea what the actual name of this tense is, but you can think of it as "a tense that WAS the future, at that time in the past." for instance: Jim knows that his son will make the game-winning shot. this sentence translates into the past tense as Jim knew that his son would make the game-winning shot. 2 * it's a CONDITIONAL - i.e., it describes what would occur in some alternate situation that is not actually the case. for instance: if i were rich, i would buy my own island.)

* the analysts' predictions are ongoing into the present, so the past tense "predicted" is inappropriate.

（转）Point to discuss:
As per manhattanprep.c…-t7994-15.html
"what his father gave him are a few books."
Ron: "no, you would still write "is", because the subject of the verb is still what his father gave him, not a few books."

The subject here is “what is much more difficult to determine”
As per Manhattan SC guide this is called Sub Phrase and it is always singular.

news是单数名词，应该用was

重复性同位语

D是说的减少车道，但文中的方案是两项：减少车道+增加自行车和人行道，并且重心在后者，因为是making downtown easier to reach。所以D是迷惑选项

for anybody who wants to know the answer, --- by Ron probably the easiest way to go here is to remember this as an idiomatic usage of the construction "known to". if the action is in the present, then you use "known to VERB"; if the action is in the past, then you use "known to have VERBed". as far as i know, these are the only two possible forms.

E有一个容易忽略的问题，但很严重。 例：(RON) my friend from florida came to the bar --> he's originally from florida my friend came to the bar from florida --> 3000 miles is a long, long way to go for some beers. 名词后有介词成分修饰时，是不可以把谓语动词放在名词和介词中间的，否则介词就会修饰这个动词，从而改变语义。题中of 100是不可以修饰动词的，也就是在E选项这样排列后语义是完全不通的，连改变语义都说不上。

没注意是5个不同的正数。条件1也是单独成立的

“more so than” is an idiom

It is used in making a "more than" type of comparison where you also want to refer to a previously stated verb/action (that's where the "so" comes in). In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."

Notice here that you are comparing two groups of women: those who take new jobs, and those who retire completely. When making a comparison, you have to make sure you explicitly mention both groups.

B, C, and D don't do this. (In fact, B and D change the original meaning of the sentence to make the second part of the comparison a hypothetical - but the original meaning is that the ones who take new jobs are being compared to those who don't.)

Also remember that, for comparisons, the two things/groups / whatever compared should be parallel. "women who took" and "those who retired" are parallel. The other options aren't.

AC选项错误差不多——没找到不代表没有 A没有在附近找到谷物不代表附近没有 C 没有显示猫是否捉老鼠，猫有可能捉也有可能不捉，有两个可能。

OG2018对D的官方翻译：树里的水是他生长时的雨水（代表1600到2400年前的雨水），山洞里的水是更久以前沉积的雨水（代表比2400年前还要早的雨水）。所以没有可比性。
雨水里有D，用木头里的D含量推测降雨量。很久以前在北美的树里有很高的D，比现在的树含量高。但是同期洞穴里水的D物质含量去没有现在北美雨水里的含量高。 GAP：为什么同一时期树里的D比洞穴水里的D含量高 E：不是问那个时期木头和现在木头的D含量比较，gap不对。 D: 说明tree里的D才是当时雨水里的D，而洞穴水里的D不是同一时期同一来源的。

区分大猩猩和其他动物的是capacity for MSR 而不是 exhibits social behavior

1.句子结构，这是个强调句啊！要不是因为....，星星就可以...
后面一定要是个完整的句子，而且主句必须一开头就是主语，AB错
2.动词时态，CE的have肯定是错的。
3.句意推理，have caused a star's collapse，E的这个句意错了，是哪个星星的？不是他本身？E错

Command subjunctive
Bossy verb + That+subject+ bare form of verb：the infinitive（to be，to do）without the to

(D) "Charge X amount" is perfectly parallel to "charge Y amount" in the first half.

(E) "Those charging" has no counterpart in the first half.

一、时态。天体的远近是客观存在的，因此用现在时，所以that were 错了
二、so...that 结构。变成 so...for 明显错误

c 公立学校老师数量，现在比上一次recession之前多20%－陷阱是我们会想这些多出来的就是上次recession期间雇的呀，这里有两个错误：第一以史为鉴由过去推测将来是gmat的一个fallacy，第二现在下这个结论是政策有变化，刚刚才决定公立学校始终免费，老师学生比不变，所以上一次recession没这个限制，新政策和此前的老师增加没关系

C的错误在于后半句。第二句并不是质疑这个assumption，第二句质疑的是由这个assumption所推导出来的“many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product”这个结论。

竖着一列一列加就得了，很多数的加法运算，只要有正负数一定要结合正负使得数字变小。这个题7列，加到第四列就知道每一列的合都差4了。