CD:我跟你一样的选了B。不过我现在反反复复看了很多遍。觉得问题所在是第一句话的前提上。所以整段话的前提都是为了实现Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.这个目标。所以非安全敏感地带只能属于无关项了。
E也是一样，out of scope。

anyway,C也不是个什么好选项。假设他们确实hide了。但是并不影响他们的禁令。比如20个喝酒的。19个hide。不禁和禁还相差了一个人。总是对预防由好处的。而且题目问的是undermine the argument，而并非问的是if true, the company will not reach their goal。两者是不一样的。前者是需要整段话的逻辑。反正我觉得这个题愤懑

DE错在that使用，如果 that 修饰records，后面的句子指代records主动要表达的动作或者内容。
原文 proven records 是想修饰 什么样的borrowers (they do not pay pack their loans on time) = records of these borrowers that they do not pay...

such 就是修饰a group 的，应该不是考点
with such a group 错在with，消失了主语

原文 high frequently 原因是prey availability was low, 和 intense competition over kills 等
问题 less frequently 会怎样？
答：prey availability was high = during periods in which more prey were available

请教毕老师，为什么B 是现在进行时，原句子In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted 是过去式

Locke’s intellectual heirs it was only a short step to the “labor theory of value,” whose formulators held that 100 percent of the value of any product is generated by labor (the human work needed to produce goods)

我的纠结的点是end可以作为持续性动词

应该定义到第二段“ If early judicial decisions were prejudiced against patentees, ……, provided a lasting foundation for patent law. ”
一方面说明support未改变 另一方面说明作者认为之前没有prejudice

with是伴随着...的苦难
of是....的困难

1.句意推理，more fuel-efficient small cars意思是造更多车，重点在车上
small cars that are more fuel-efficient ，重点在更节能上，后者更符合句意。DE错
A的意思是造车的动作更节省油，A的句意更错，A错。
2.比较，平行，more..than...，AE对比的对象都不一致
B的than they were的were用错，ABE错。

1.措辞，economical（实惠的）错，BC错
2.比较More than，后面直接接now是不对的，比较对象不明确，
只有在more than前面也有时间状语的时候，可以直接接now,省略前面的主句
AE错。

1.措辞，不能用Less，因为比较的是数字，是可数的，ADE错
2.idiom: ono-quater as many表示同样的数量。
同理还有twice as many.
3.一致，there are和Less,that the amount一看就不一致。AC错
4.the amount是指代不可数的，C就不一致，D的the number和the amount不能对比，CD错
fewer可数，less不可数，amount代不可数，number代可数

一道一道题的评论看下来，发现有些评论的解释真是胡说八道，大家看的时候还是以毕出老师或者ron的解释为准，有时候不一定大家都这么说就是对的，也有可能是复制同一个人错误的解释。

这题就是比较主干 - ACDE 都是cost is projected, 但其实是cost达到xxx 被projected, 只有B主干是cost达到xxx 这件事情被projected

提亮内容是：asteroids larger than 200 meters across are multicomponent structures or rubble piles

即 larger than 200 meters --> multicomponent structure / rubble piles

要question这个结论个人的想法是

大于200 但不是multicomponent structure / rubble piles
小于200 但是是multicomponent structure / rubble piles

但是发现选项都是大小和配速，所以破题点是找出不符合文章描述的大小、速度匹配的 —— 200meters 配速是 once every few hours以内，超出的不存在。

文章很tricky的是关于配速的描述faster than once every few hours(depending on the asteroid’s bulk density) would fly apart——这里的depending不是指其他density下会有其他速度，而是说由density决定

关于five observed asteroids 的描写是 obey a strict limit on rate of rotations.
后文紧接着写 The exception are all smaller than 200 ... with an abrupt cutoff for asteroids larger than that.

这意味着，这五个行星与the exception的是不同的。关于the exception的特征是with an abrupt cutoff——这是rubble pile的特征，那么这五个行星就是相对的monolith。


A approximately the same——错，文章在rubble pile提到spinning/rotation rate——depending on the asteroid’s bulk density。并且没有讲到“速度相同”的内容。
B the same number of collisions. ——错
D 这是rubble pile的特征——见原文fly apart
E detected only recently.——错。原文没有提到啥时候detect的

为什么不是1000

摘自国外网站的解释，key point是：第二段是原理类比，而非analyze/evaluate/evidence。
The methodology proposed in the first paragraph involves a hypothetical technique for measuring a small solid object’s mass in space (by placing the object on a spring scale and swinging the scale in a circle at the end of a string).

The second paragraph does not discuss practical ways for using THAT hypothetical technique. In other words, the second paragraph does not analyze practical applications of the spring scale/small-solid-object method. Instead, the second paragraph describes a different technique that is analogous to the spring scale/small-solid-object method.

In other words, the second paragraph does not discuss (or analyze) the practical applications of the spring scale/small solid method. Instead, the second paragraph describes an analogous procedure. Furthermore, this analogous procedure is described but is not really analyzed.

问：两群人在以下哪个观点发生争议disagree？

PH：认为资本主义发展没受到挑战
The scholars: 认为资本主义发展受到了严重挑战 = 存在严重的质疑/反对

B选项：分号通常连接两个分句，即，前后均需要是完整的句子（虽然个别的时候（一般为连接平行对象时），分号能与逗号相互替换，但是本质上，分号应连接两个独立的分句）。

1.逻辑推理，主语应该是人，BDE错
2.比较，比较对象应该一致，AE错
3.指代错误，D的that指代的是Iceland's per capita publication，D错